Laserfiche WebLink
<br />H. <br /> <br />Proposition No. 21 <br /> <br />Indicate your choice of method for the selection of the <br />Judge of the Municipal Court of Record: <br /> <br />572 Selection by the City Council of the <br />San Marcos; <br /> <br />City <br /> <br />of <br /> <br />1158 Election every two (2) or four (4) years; <br /> <br />F. <br /> <br />That the official canvass of the returns of said <br />election reflects the following votes cast for and <br />against single-member districts for the election and <br />service of City Council Members: <br /> <br />Proposition No. 22 (Non-binding) <br /> <br />Single-member districts for the election and service of <br />City Council members <br /> <br />Votes for proposition No. 22: 966 <br />Votes against Proposition No. 22: 790 <br /> <br />G. <br /> <br />That the official canvass of the return~ of said <br />election reflects the following votes cast regarding the <br />proposition pertaining to single-member district systems <br />if the City of San Marcos adopts a single-member <br />district plan: <br /> <br />Proposition No. 23 (Non-binding) <br /> <br />If the City of San Marcos adopts a <br />district plan, which of the following <br />district systems would you prefer: <br /> <br />single-member <br />single-member <br /> <br />693 <br /> <br />Mayor elected at large, six City Council Members <br />elected in districts; <br /> <br />616 <br /> <br />Mayor elected at large, two (2) City Council <br />members elected at large, four (4) City Council <br />members elected in districts; <br /> <br />119 <br /> <br />Seven (7) City Council members elected <br />districts, Mayor selected by City Council; <br /> <br />That the official canvas of the returns of said election <br />reflects the following votes cast for and against the <br />establishment of a street assessment program: <br /> <br />in <br /> <br />Proposition No. 24 (Non-binding) <br /> <br />The establishment of a street assessment program whereby <br />owners will be charged for paving improvements on <br />streets abutting their property. <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />Votes for Proposition No. 24: 281 <br />Votes against Proposition No. 24: 1224 <br /> <br />That the official canvass of the returns <br />election reflects the following votes cast <br />against authorizing the City Council to <br />subdivision plats after their approval by the <br />Commission, as permitted by State Law: <br /> <br />of said <br />for and <br />approve <br />Planning <br /> <br />Proposition No. 25 (Non-binding) <br /> <br />Authorizing the City Council to approve subdivision <br />plats after their approval by the Planning Commission, <br />as permitted by state law. <br /> <br />Votes cast for Proposition No. 25: 863 <br />Votes cast against proposition No. 25: 624 <br />