Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 71 <br />Regular Meeting October 22, 1984 Page 3 <br />Chamber of Commerce and that they would agree to replenish the bond <br />as it was used. His client was willing to pick up the trash off his <br />own property but not off the property of others. Mr. Hankins said <br />the parties could agree to stipulations but that the City could not <br />impose stipulations. No one else wished to speak in favor or in op- <br />position, so Mayor Craddock closed the public hearing. <br />Mr. Brown moved the Council adjourn into Executive Session pursuant <br />to Article 6252-17, §2 (e), V.A.C.S., to discuss matters where the <br />duty of the City Attorney to the City pursuant to the Code of Profes- <br />sional Responsibility of the State Bar of Texas requires confiden- <br />tiality and Mr. Coddington seconded the motion, which passed unani- <br />mously (8:58 p.m.). <br />Mr. Coddington moved the Council convene at 9:20 p.m. and Mr. Guerra <br />seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. <br />Mayor Craddock introduced for consideration action regarding the above <br />appeal of Billy Kolander, as President of B.R.Y.M., Inc. from the Zon- <br />ing Commission's decision of October 2, 1984 regarding the issuanse of <br />a specific use permit. Mr. Coddington moved to approve the granting <br />of a specific use permit with the following stipulations: 1. a $1,000 <br />bond to be posted with the City of San Marcos by B.R.Y.M., Inc. to be <br />used in the event damage is done to neighboring businesses due to <br />actions of the applicant's patrons (or to be administered by an agreed <br />party such as the Chamber of Commerce), 2. to have litter picked up <br />at the end of each and every night the applicant is open for business <br />so that litter is not on applicant's premises or adjacent property <br />the next day, 3. to upgrade exterior lighting to meet proposed stan- <br />dards, 4. to open at 6:00 p.m. each day the business is open, and <br />5. to abide by the new Ordinance regulating bars when it is adopted <br />by the City Council in the near future. Mr. Moore seconded the mo- <br />tion. On roll call the following vote was recorded: <br /> AYE: Coddington, Craddock, Kissler, Moore. <br /> NAY: Brown, Parr, Guerra. <br /> ABSTAIN: None. <br />Mayor Craddock introduced for consideration action regarding the ap- <br />peal of Willie Higgs from the Zoning Board of Adjustments' decision <br />of September 24, 1984 regarding a variance request of Bud Walker. <br />Mayor Craddock moved to hear the appeal of Mr. Higgs and Ms. Kissler <br />seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. Bob Higgs was present <br />representing his father, Willie Higgs. He stated they were not op- <br />posed to Mr. Walker's restoration of the building located at 322 <br />Hopkins, but thought the parking situation needed to be addressed. <br />He stated the Zoning Board of Adjustments had granted a variance <br />which would allow Mr. Walker to provide only fifteen parking spaces <br />rather than twenty-seven. After discussion Mayor Craddock moved to <br />grant the variance request of Mr. Walker in concurrence with the <br />decision of the Zoning Board of Adjustments' decision of September <br />24, 1984. Mr. Coddington seconded the motion. On roll call the fol- <br />lowing vote was recorded: <br /> AYE: Brown, Coddington, Farr, Craddock, Kissler, Moore. <br /> NAY: Guerra. <br /> ABSTAIN: None. <br />