Laserfiche WebLink
<br />93 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Regular Meeting November 5, 1984 Page 6 <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Coddington moved for adoption of the Resolution and Mayor Crad- <br />dock seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. <br /> <br />Mayor Craddock introduced for consideration approval of the issuance <br />of Multi-Family Housing Bonds by Capital Area Planning Council (CAPCO) <br />for a project known as Post Oak Apartments (C. A. Elder and Steve <br />Epps, General Partners - Herman Newman Company project). Scott Sheldon <br />of the law firm of Sheldon and King in Beaumont, Texas was present re- <br />presenting Messrs. Elder and Epps,and stated the project would be fi- <br />nanc~through tax exempt bonds from CAPCO. Mr. Robbins stated the <br />property had been apnexed into the City, zoned and platted and needs <br />to go through the permitting process. The project is on the priority <br />list for LUEs on the third package plant and the project is also in <br />the Priority I moratorium area. Mr. Sheldon said CAPCO had authorized <br />the issuance of the bonds for the project and they needed the City's <br />approval for the issuance of the bonds. Mr. Brown expressed concern <br />of CAPCO's criteria and where they are headed. He said the communica- <br />tion is not clear what CAPCO is doing (The project is considered resi- <br />dential living for low to moderate incomesand Messrs. Elder and Epps <br />estimated the monthly rental of the apartments to be $375.00 to $425.00 <br />for a two-bedroom apartment). After much discussion Ms. Kissler moved <br />to table this matter to the November 19, 1984 Regular Meeting of the <br />Council and requested Richard Bean of CAPCO and Tess Norris, represent- <br />ing the City of San Marcos, to be present at that meeting to provide <br />information to the Council. Mr. Guerra seconded the motion. On roll <br />call the following vote was recorded: <br /> <br />AYE: Brown, Coddington, Farr, Guerra, Kissler, Moore. <br /> <br />NAY: Craddock. <br /> <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br /> <br />Mayor Craddock introduced a report from the City Attorney regarding <br />zoning violations. Mr. Hankins stated the City has had 17 complaints <br />this fall, 6 of which will be filed within a week, 4 did not have merit, <br />1 had been resolved through voluntary compliance and 6 had not yet been <br />fully investigated. He stated an Ordinance would be presented to the <br />Council in the future which would provide Landlord and Tenant provisions <br />and would help to alleviate this zoning violation. <br /> <br />Mr. Guerra moved the Council adjourn into Executive Session pursuant <br />to Article 6252-17, §§2(e), (f) and (g), V.A.C.S., to discuss contemplat~d <br />litigation, pending litigation (Stokes, Et Al vs. City) and matters where <br />the duty of the City Attorney to the City pursuant to the Code of Pro- <br />fessional Responsibility of the State Bar of Texas requires confiden- <br />tiality, negotiation of contracts, the purchase, exchange, lease or <br />value of real property, and personnel. Ms. Kissler seconded the motion, <br />which passed unanimously (9:17 p.m.). <br /> <br />Ms. Kissler moved the meeting convene at 11:18 p.m. and Mr. Guerra se- <br />conded the motion, which passed unanimously. <br /> <br />Mayor Craddock introduced for consideration requesting the Municipal <br />Court Judges to evaluate and review the minimum fine schedule. Mr. <br />Guerra stated he was not satisfied with the minimum charges being as- <br />sessed for Ordinance and traffic violation fines and wanted the Judges <br />to review the fines and come back before the Council with their recom- <br />mendations. Judge Hernandez reviewed our present fines and fines of <br />surrounding cities with the Council and stated the main goal of the <br />Court was to have people comply with the law, not just collect money. <br />