Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,II <br /> <br />71 . <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2005- R <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />SAN MARCOS, TEXAS APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF CITY <br />WATER AND WASTEWATER MAINS TO SERVE A 30.17 <br />ACRE, MORE OR LESS, AREA PROPOSED FOR <br />DEVELOPMENT BY W.F. KARAM, INC. IN TIIE 1300 AND 1400 <br />BLOCKS OF CENTERPOINT ROAD; AND DECLARING AN <br />EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />RECITALS: <br /> <br />1. City Land Development Code Section 2.3.1.2 requires City Council approval for the <br />extension of City water or wastewater mains in the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction. <br /> <br />2. W. F. Karam, Inc. (the "Petitioner") has submitted a petition to extend City water and <br />wastewater mains to serve the 30.17 acre, more or less, tract of property described on the attached <br />Exhibit A (the "Property''), which is in the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction, to be developed for <br />commercial uses. <br /> <br />3. The City Council finds and determines that: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />(a) The proposed development to be served by the extensions appears to be consistent with <br />the Master Plan; <br /> <br />(b) The extensions are proposed to be constructed in accordance with the City's Technical <br />Construction Standards and Specifications, the provisions of Chapter 86 of the City Code, and <br />all other applicable City regulations and standards; <br /> <br />(c) It appears to be feasible to annex the property, and any intervening property which is <br />needed for utility rights-of-way, to the City in a timely manner; <br /> <br />(d) It appears that the utility extensions would not compromise the City's ability to timely <br />provide adequate water or wastewater facilities to property inside the City; <br /> <br />(e) It appears that the utility extensions will not lead to premature development that cannot <br />be served efficiently and timely by roadway, drainage or park facilities; <br /> <br />(f) It appears that the utility extensions are financially feasible given the Petitioner's <br />proposed means of financing the extension; <br /> <br />(g) It appears that the utility extensions will not lead to significant degradation of water <br />quality or other environmental resources, either from construction of the water or wastewater <br />improvements, development of petitioner's land, or development of other land that may be served <br />through the extended facilities; and <br /> <br />(11) The Petitioner is not proposing to extend City wastewater facilities without utilizing City <br /> <br />Page 1 of 2 of <br />EXHIBIT B-3 <br />