Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />(c) <br /> <br />Considcration for cxceptions to thc abovc rcquiremcnts shall bc based on the <br />following: <br /> <br />(1) ..^...rchitectural design and creativity, <br /> <br />(2) Compatibility with surrounding deycloped properties, <br /> <br />(3) Compatibility with the o'/crall character of the City, and <br /> <br />(1) Compatibility with historic character of the City. <br /> <br />The request shall be reyie'Ned by thc Plar.ning and Zoning Commission, and <br />shall also be approved or disapproved by the PlaFllling and Zoning <br />Commission. <br /> <br />Section 4.4.2.4 <br /> <br />Procedure for Approvine: Alternative Exterior Desie:ns or <br />Materials <br /> <br />(a) All requests for alternative exterior design or materials shall be clearly written, <br />specifically noted, and described on the Site Preparation Permit application. <br /> <br />(b) <br /> <br />If the Planning and Zoning Commission determines an alternative exterior design <br />or material to be equivalent to or better than the standards referenced in this <br />division, the Commission may approve an alternative design or material by <br />granting a CUP in connection with the Site Preparation Permit. <br /> <br />(c) A CUP for alternative design compliance or exterior materials shall be approved <br />or disapproved by the Planning and Zoning Commission based solely on the <br />criteria set forth in subsection (e) of this section. <br /> <br />(d) Relief from a decision of the Commission on a CUP application shall follow the <br />procedures set forth for appeal of Site Preparation Permit applications that are <br />denied. <br /> <br />(e) The Planning and Zoning Commission shall be required to make findings of full <br />compliance with each of the following criteria in any motion for approval of a <br />CUP for an alternative exterior design or material: <br /> <br />I. The grounds for the CUP are specific to a unique character of the property or <br />use in question; <br /> <br />2. Financial hardship is not the basis for the CUP; and <br /> <br />3. The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the code to an equivalent or <br />better degree than the standards cited in this division. <br /> <br />Page 23 of 50 <br />