Laserfiche WebLink
<br />84 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Regular Meeting June 9, 1986 Page 10 <br /> <br /> <br />Mayor Younger introduced for consideration adoption of a Resolution, <br />the caption which was read as follows: <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN <br />MARCOS, TEXAS, APPROVING THE SUBMISSION OF A TEXAS <br />COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION TO <br />THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR THE <br />AREA REVITALIZATION FUND; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO <br />ACT AS THE CITY'S EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND AUTHORIZED <br />REPRESENTATIVE IN ALL }1ATTERS PERTAINING TO THE CITY'S <br />PARTICIPATION IN THE CO~~UNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM, <br />AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Mr. Farr moved for adoption of the Resolution and Mr. Brown seconded <br />the motion. Mr. Nicola asked Sarah Bailey if drainage is considered <br />a separate improvement from street improvements. Ms. Bailey said it <br />is considered separate and that to become a drainage project the intent <br />of the project has to be drainage and generally that is addressed <br />through underground storm sewers. She advised this project with <br />pavement of the streets with curbs and gutters will improve the <br />drainage in that area, but only the citizens whose property fronts <br />the improvements is how the project must be designated. Steve Jenkins <br />stated the standing water seen by Mr. Nicola would for the most part <br />be taken care of by the reconstruction of the streets and by the addi- <br />tion of curbs and gutters, but overall drainage for the entire area <br />would have to be taken care of through a very large project and the <br />water routed to the river. That sort of project would cost considerably <br />more dollars, but this project will take care of most of the isolated <br />drainage problem. Mr. Nicola then moved to amend the Resolution to <br />accept Alternative 3 with grant funds in the amount of $600,000.00 <br />and local funds in the amount of $150,000.00, and Mr. Brown seconded <br />the motion, which passed unanimously. Mr. Nicola moved to amend the <br />Resolution to designate the local funds would come from General Fund <br />in the amount of $150,000.00 and Ms. Kissler seconded the motion, which <br />passed unanimously. Mr. Coddington moved the Staff be directed to make <br />all necessary additions for the conformance of the application as ap- <br />proved by the Council and Mr. Farr seconded the motion, which passed <br />unanimously. The Council then voted unanimously for adoption of the <br />Resolution. <br /> <br />Mayor Younger introduced for consideration adoption of a Resolution, <br />the caption which was read as follows: <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN <br />}1ARCOS, TEXAS, APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF <br />A PROPOSED CONTRACT FOR THE COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT <br />AD VALOREM TAXES BETWEEN SAID CITY AND , <br />AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT, AND <br />DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Mr. Guerra moved for adoption of the Resolution and Ms. Kissler se- <br />conded the motion. Mr. Guerra requested the Ethics Review Commission <br />look into the possible conflict of interest of Mr. Marcos Hernandez <br />being affiliated with the City in a contract if Heard, Goggan, Blair, <br />Williams & Earrison are selected. Each firm was then allowed to give <br />a short presentation to the Council on their delinquent tax contract <br />proposal. On roll call for selection of a firm, the following vote <br />was recorded: <br /> <br />Brown: Heard, Goggan, Blair, Williams & Harrison. <br />Coddington: Heard, Goggan, Blair, Williams & Harrison. <br />Farr: Heard, Goggan, Blair, Williams & Harrison. <br />Younger: Gates Steen. <br />Guerra: John R. Heard. <br />Kissler: Heard, Goggan, Blair, Williams & Harrison. <br />Nicola: John R. Heard. <br />