Res 1986-106 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~1 capital Cost Estimates of capital expendituri?.t! on an annual basis are not included, due to the large number of "]'!'1':'iflhles which significantly influence project financing, includi.."1q the uncerta.i.nty over Federal assistance proqrams. However, the development phasing shown will permit a reasonable distribution of capital expenditures over the 1985-2005 period, and should avoid the requirement for simultaneous expenditures for major oonstr.uction projects. It should be kept in mind that the sequence of project development indicated is based upon the assessment of demand for improved facilities within reasonable time and financial cxmstraints. Fach pmject should be given careful study prior to implementation, since priorities can change drastically over a twenty year planning period. Adequate lead time must also be allowed for project development requiring Federal action, such as land transfer from the Job Corps center . Ccital ).Innrtt-nq- Soar:ces The operation and maintenance expenses projected in this section cxmaider ally those expenses necessary for the normal, everyday opera- tion and maintenance of San Marcos Municipal Airport, and do not consider the additional costs required for future major capital i.mpt:cN~ts. Following is a discussion of the most probable sources of capital improvement funds available for future development pEOgrClde. ....1 A88istance ~~CIIIIIt The Airport Improvement Program (AlP) is a funding program which provides financial assistance to plblic and certain private use air- ports. Federal participation is based upon a 90 percent. Federal and lO percent local share. There are several categories of funding1 San Marcos Mmlicipal AiIport would likely be eligible for consideration as a reliever airport, and would possibly receive higher priority consideration than other airports in the immediate vicinity. In addition to adm.ini.stering the Federal funding for airport projects, the PM also provides direct funding for the development of terminal navigation facilities and certain eligible approach aids. These projects include airfield lighting, certain electronic aids to navigation such as VOR, and are generally classified under the facilities and equipnent program (F&E) with lOOt funding for oonstruc- tim and maintenance. PM criteria for determining airport project priorities is complex and depends on many external factors, including regional needs as well as 9.6