Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I I . WORK PROGRAM <br /> <br />This chapter consists of a description of individual tasks of the proposed work <br />program. Tasks are presented in sequential order though some overlap will <br />occur. <br /> <br />Task 1: Study Area Definition <br /> <br />Through discussions with city staff, we would propose first to <br />identify the study area boundaries. We envision this could include <br />the area within the city limits, extraterritorial jurisdiction and <br />likely areas of future expansion. From this we would prepare a base <br />map. <br /> <br />Task 2: Evaluation of Existing Data <br /> <br />We would propose to review the data available for San Marcos. This <br />evaluation would include a review of traffic counts available from <br />previous work like that of Walter P. Moore, State Department of <br />Highways and Public Transportation (SDHPT), and the City of San <br />Marcos. During staff discussions, we would also discuss the socio- <br />demographic data in the modeling. <br /> <br />Task 3: Delineation of Traffic Serial Zones/Data Base Unit of Analysis <br /> <br />With an emphasis on making the traffic serial zones as compatible as <br />possible with other geographical units of analysis (e.g. census <br />tracts, planning areas) and with close staff communication, we would <br />propose to define the transportation network's traffic serial zones. <br />Reviewing special needs of the city staff and evaluating the City's <br />comprehensive plans and area specific plans (e.g. redevelopment, <br />parks) we would also define the traffic serial zones into sectors. <br />Equivalency tables between census tracts, census block groups, traf- <br />fic serial zones, and transportation sectors would be prepared and a <br />map of these various geographic units would also be produced. <br /> <br />Task 4: Evaluation of NCHRP Reports "Transferrable Parameters" <br /> <br />We would propose to evaluate NCHRP report 187, "Quick-Response Urban <br />Travel Estimation Techniques and Transferrable Parametersll (TRB, <br />1978), in light of their applicability to San Marcos. We envision <br />this would be a critical study element since the trip generation <br />parameters at the smallest sized population category are for <br />urbanized areas from 50,000 to 100,000 population. Specifically, the <br />Report 187 trip generation tables would be evaluated against the ITE <br />Trip Generation Manual (3rd edition, 1982), Special Traffic Generator <br />Study (SDHPT, 1974), Trip Generation Analysis, 1975, and other Texas <br />data, as available. <br /> <br />Specifically, we propose to evaluate Table 1, "Average Vehicle Trip <br />Rates and Other Characteristics of Generators," in terms of vehicle <br />trips and peaking characteristics. For the different land uses, we <br />would provide ranges of trip generation, by source of information and <br />recommend a mean rate. We envision part of this analysis will entail <br />limited research into the temporal stability and transferrability of <br /> <br />2 <br />