Laserfiche WebLink
<br />28 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, <br />TEXAS, AUGUST 4, 1986. <br /> <br /> <br />Present: Mayor J. E. Younger <br /> <br />Council Members *Karl W. Brown <br />*Bill Coddington <br />Gerald G. Farr <br />*Fred Guerra <br />Betty Jane Kissler <br />William C. Nicola <br /> <br />City Manager A. C. Gonzalez <br />City Attorney Lamar Hankins <br />City Secretary's Office Susan N. Ripps <br />Assistant City Manager Robert T. Herrera <br />Director of Public Works George Boeker <br /> <br />Others present: Amy Shaw, Patty Sullivan, Melissa Millecam, Larry DuPont, <br />Daniel Corbett, Syd Newman, Jim Gandy, Larry Franks, Rayford Price, Jack <br />Cates, and others. <br /> <br />Mayor Younger called the meeting to order at 9:00 p.m. <br /> <br />Mayor Younger introduced for consideration adoption of a Resolution, the <br />caption which was read as follows: <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MAR- <br />COS, TEXAS, DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTENTION <br />TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION, AND DECLARING AN EF- <br />FECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Mr. Farr moved to discuss the Resolution, and Ms. Kissler seconded the <br />motion. City Manager Gonzalez stated that the ultimate goal was to meet <br />the deadline of September 1, 1986. He presented several plans of action <br />for the Council to consider as options. Plan A-Revenue Bonds: Would need <br />Justice Department clearance, Public Utility Clearance, Rating and State <br />Attorney General; Plan B-Certificates of Obligation with tax pledge: <br />No Justice Department Clearance, Tax Problem; Plan C-Certificates of . <br />Obligation without tax pledge: No Justice Department clearance, Public <br />Utility Commission, possible Attorney General availability problem. <br />Plan A-Revenue Bonds: This plan is the original course of action the <br />voters of the City approved. Ms. Kissler stated she would like the Council <br />to use this plan. She stated that if we did make the deadline that would <br />be great, but if we didn't make the deadline, there would not be much <br />difference in reduction of bonds. She stressed a concern with Plan B & <br />Plan C. Mr. Farr was opposed to Plan B. He did not want to have a tax <br />pledge. Mr. Gonzalez stated that the tax pledge would speed up the process <br />by a few days. C.O.'s with a tax pledge would mean that the Attorney Gen- <br />eral would not have to personally come down for the sale. Mr. Larry Franks <br />stated his concerns with Plan B and Plan C. He urged the Council to pro- <br />ceed with the original Plan-Revenue Bonds. Ms. Patty Sullivan stated the <br />same concern as Mr. Franks. She also urged the Council proceed with Plan <br />A-Revenue Bonds. City Manager Gonzalez stated that the proposed Res- <br />olution would be a good alternative to possibly beat the September deadline <br />if the Revenue Bond Plan A could not be met in time. Mr. Franks again <br />stressed and urged the Council to proceed with Plan A-Revenue Bonds. Ms. <br />Sullivan concurred with him. Mr. Gonzalez stated that he wanted the <br />Council to be informed regarding the strategies they could take. <br />Ms. Kissler moved to amend Exhibit A - the last sentence, to delete the <br />following language: "and the levy of ad valorem taxes" and Mayor Younger <br />seconded the motion which passed unanimously. The Council then voted <br />on the Resolution, all voting to deny adoption of the Resolution. TEe <br />Council will proceed with Plan A-Revenue Bonds. <br /> <br /> <br />* Messrs. Brown, Coddington and Guerra were not present at this meeting. <br />