My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01141985 Regular Meeting
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
1980 s
>
1985
>
01141985 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2009 4:52:08 PM
Creation date
12/2/2003 4:53:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
City Clerk - Type
Regular Meeting
Date
1/14/1985
Volume Book
69
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />53 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Regular Meeting January 14, 1985 Page 10 <br /> <br /> <br />will be implemented by the Planning Commission and the Director of <br />Environment and Engineering is charged with primary responsibility <br />for making that determination, and the City needs to move as quickly <br />as possible to prevent further problems as we have recently exper- <br />ienced. When problems are brought to the attention of the Texas <br />Water Development Board and if someone applies for a permit which they <br />regulate, are two means by which the Board finds out there are problems. <br />Mr. Gonzalez said there are two different interpretations as to what <br />their position is in regard to areas over the Aquifer that may be out- <br />side the area currently delineated on the map, one is they will enforce <br />the regulations if it is shown to be hydrologically connected and the <br />other interpretation is they will not. Mr. Hankins then requested the <br />Council consider an amendment in Section 4 of this Ordinance, amending <br />Article VI of Section F to add. . . information from the Edwards Under- <br />ground Water District and the Edwards Aquifer Research and Data Center, <br />"percolation tests, core samples and other such tests and data as may <br />be required by the Director of Environment and Engineering", which amend- <br />ment Mr. Hankins fully read into the record. Then Mr. Hankins offered <br />a second amendment to this Ordinance which amends Section 6 of this Ordin- <br />ance, Article VI, Section H, which follows 3., as follows, "4. Notwith- <br />standing §3 above, when private sewage facilities are to be utilized <br />on a lot, the lot shall be designed to accommodate the proper and effect- <br />ive function of the private sewage facility and a private water well, if a <br />private water well is to be utilized. Lots using private sewage facili- <br />ties shall be designed or configured based on a minimum of one (1) per- <br />colation test for every two (2) acres and one (1) core sample for every <br />five (5) acres soil samples, and other tests as required by the Director <br />of Environment and Engineering or the Planning Commission. Additional <br />percolation tests and core samples may be ordered if results of pre- <br />vious tests in the immediate area, geological evidence of unusual <br />faulting, fractures or other recharge structures, and the size of the <br />subdivision warrant such additional tests as determined by the Director <br />of Environment and Engineering", which amendment Mr. Hankins fully read <br />into the record. In Section 156.20.005A2 of the Texas Water Development <br />Board Regulations, Licensing Requirements for New Private Sewage Facili- <br />ties, Mr. Hankins said it is not their intention for the one-acre lot <br />requirement to be automatic, as the Rules go on to say "the lot or tract <br />in question must be large enough considering the soil and drainage condi- <br />tions and probable volume of sewage to be disposed of to permit the use <br />of a private sewage facility without causing water pollution, nuisance <br />conditions or danger to public health". No one else wished to speak <br />in favor or in opposition to the Ordinance or amendments, so Mayor <br />Craddock closed the public hearing. Mayor Craddock moved for adoption <br />of the Ordinance on emergency and Mr. Moore seconded the motion. Mr. <br />Farr moved to amend the Ordinance to add the language as fully read <br />into the record by Mr. Hankins to Section 4 of this Ordinance, which <br />amends Article VI, Section F. Ms. Kissler seconded the motion. Mr. <br />Brown asked Mr. Robbins what kind of expenses would be involved in <br />this requirement of a more extensive environmental impact statement. <br />Mr. Robbins stated the Staff established some standards of the kinds <br />of things that need to be in the statement, which would advise someone <br />who wants to develop an environmentally sensitive piece of land what <br />would be expected early in the process, the platting process, so there <br />would not be suprises what would be expected. He said our statement <br />asks information other jurisdictions require. Mr. Farr thought it <br />would be desirous to have a statement form, and Mr. Robbins said this <br />is what the Staff has tried to do, but it would be difficult to prepare <br />a specific statement form because of the diverse land of our area, steep <br />slopes, Recharge Zone, endangered species, etc. Mr. Gonzalez said the Staff <br />would look into this matter. The Council then voted unanimously for <br />approval of Mr. Farr's amendment. Mr. Farr then suggested recommendations <br />be made by the Staff to the Council in the future regarding signs being <br />placed advising the public they were "entering the Edwards Aquifer Recharge <br />Zone". Ms. Kissler moved to amend Section 6, Article VI, Section H to add <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.