Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Dr. Kent Butl er October 21, 1985 <br /> Page 3 <br /> purposes of this report it is assumed that 1,000 gpm can be withdrawn from <br /> each well, provided that the proper well spacing is maintained. <br /> The water supply facilities should provide at least enough water to meet <br /> the demands of the peak day to prevent the depletion of storage. The <br /> supply should also consist of at least two wells to ensure that the water <br /> supply can be maintained if one well becomes inoperable. The following <br /> well facilities are recommended to serve the entire study area: <br /> We 11 s <br /> Planning Year LUEs No. Total Capacity(gpm) <br /> - <br /> 1990 1,898 2 2,000 <br /> 1995 6,154 6 6,200 <br /> 2005 14,088 14 14,100 <br /> STORAGE <br /> In order to meet Texas Department of Health requirements for an "Approved" <br /> public water supply, a total of 185 gallons of storage per capita must be <br /> provided. Of this amount, at least 55 gallons per capita must be elevated <br /> suffi ci ently to maintain system pressures above 35 psi during normal <br /> conditions. Ground storage (and pumping) should be located on the <br /> opposite side of the system from the elevated storage where practical. The <br /> proposed storage facilities for the study area are shown in Figures 2,3, <br /> and 4. <br /> It is recommended initially that a 100,000 gallon temporary storage tank <br /> be built within the Rivergate MUD west of Post Road. As the area develops <br /> and provides tax and utility revenues, this tank should be replaced by a <br /> 3.0 million gallon (MG) tank adjacent to it. They should have overflow <br /> elevations of about 767 feet. These would serve as elevated storage for <br /> the Lower Pressure Plane and ground storage for the Upper Pressure Plane <br /> and the permanent tank should be sufficient for these needs beyond 1995. <br /> To meet the additional growth expected through the year 2005, a second <br /> permanent tank with a 2.0 MG capacity should be constructed near the <br /> western boundary of the Rivergate MUD. It too would serve as elevated <br /> storage for the Lower Pressure Plane and ground storage for the Upper <br /> Pressure Plane. Although a 2.0 MG reservoir would meet the storage needs <br /> projected through 1995, the 3.0 MG reservoir is recommended for the first <br /> site because its location is more effective in meeting the long-term needs <br /> of the system. <br /> To meet the need for elevated storage in the Upper Pressure Plane, it is <br /> recommended that a 0.4 MG elevated tank be built in the vicinity of the <br /> southwest corner of the Rivergate MUD. This tank, with an overflow <br /> elevation of approximately 905 feet, shoul d be adequate through the year <br /> 1995. After that time, it is expected that an additional 0.4 MG tank will <br /> be required further west. <br /> The 3.0 MG and 2.0 MG reservoirs described above are designed to meet the <br /> elevated storage needs of the Lower Pressure Plane. However, when <br />