My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 2014-119/Adopting an Annexation and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (“ETJ”) Management Strategy
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Res 2014-119/Adopting an Annexation and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (“ETJ”) Management Strategy
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2015 4:01:41 PM
Creation date
9/8/2014 8:44:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Adopting
Number
2014-119
Date
9/2/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ETJ Management Issues <br />Because of the relationship between annexation and the ETJ, ETJ management is critical. There are a <br />number of ETJ issues that San Marcos and rapidly growing cities face. They include: <br />1. Requests for ETJ exchanges and releases between other cities <br />2. Petitions for creation of Municipal Utility Districts (MUDS) and Water Districts <br />3 . Petitions for creation of ETJ Public Improvement Districts (PIDs) <br />4. Development of large projects that cannot be immediately annexed or for which deferral of <br />annexation is sought through approval of a development agreement. <br />The application of the following best management practices can aid in dealing with these issues. <br />Best Management Practices (BMPs) for the City's ETJ Management <br />1. ETJ management decisions should support implementation of the Comprehensive Plan and the <br />adopted Annexation / ETJ Management Strategy. ETJ management decisions support the <br />Comprehensive Plan by directing growth towards the appropriate intensity zone in the ETJ. <br />2. Discretionary actions, including consent to the creation of MUDS and PIDs in the ETJ or approval <br />of development agreements should be evaluated in terms of their impact on implementation of <br />the Comprehensive Plan and on annexation of the property that is the subject of the <br />discretionary action. <br />3. Owners of properties in the ETJ that have not otherwise consented to annexation will be offered <br />annexation /development agreements. If the owners have a development proposal that has staff <br />support, an agreement in accordance with Sec 212.172 Local Government Code agreements <br />should be negotiated. Owners of land expected to remain in agricultural use should be offered <br />an agreement meeting the requirements of Section 43.035 Local Government Code <br />4. The Annexation /ETJ Review Team will meet routinely to establish linkages between annexation <br />and the CIP, utility extension and budget processes. <br />5. City Council will meet routinely to hear Annexation /ETJ Review Team briefings and discuss the <br />policy and amend the Strategy as necessary. <br />6. Property acquired by the City will be evaluated to determine suitability for annexation. <br />7. Property that can be served when utilities are extended, whether through an Out of City Utility <br />extension or connection request or a City Capital Improvement Project, will be evaluated to <br />determine the suitability for and timing of annexation. <br />8. The schedules for approval of annexations by the City Council should be planned to meet <br />applicable laws, ordinances and public notice requirements. <br />2111age <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.