My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01111988 Regular Meeting
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
1980 s
>
1988
>
01111988 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2007 4:41:57 PM
Creation date
12/2/2003 2:38:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
City Clerk - Type
Regular Meeting
Date
1/11/1988
Volume Book
90
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />-R- <br /> <br />20. Sec. l2.()IÍ, Special pro~7isions coverinG da(T1aqe suits, should <br />amended as follows: <br /> <br />he <br /> <br />"Before the City shall be liable to damage claim or suit for <br />personal injury, or damage to property, the person who is injured <br />or whose property is damaged or someone in that person's behalf <br />shall give the City Manager or the person performing the duties of <br />City Secretary notice in writing within ninety (90) days after the <br />occurrence of the alleged iniury, or damage, stating specifically <br />in such notice when, where or how the injury was sustained, and <br />setting forth the extent of the injury or damage as accurately as <br />possible. Provided, however, that the ninety (90) day notice <br />requirement of this section may be extended by a court of competent <br />jurisdiction for good cause shown if the injured party has <br />exercised due diligence, if any delay in giving the notice <br />required by this section is not the result of conscious <br />indifference by the party and if there is no substantial harm to <br />the City caused by the delay...." <br /> <br />JUSTI FI CATION: <br /> <br />Over the last few years, several Texas courts have held that ninety <br />(90) days is an insufficient period of time to give notice of a <br />damage claim or suit for personal injury or damage to property. <br />There are two ways to correct this problem: The ninety (90) day <br />time period can be extended to One Hundred Twenty (120) days or <br />One Hundred Eighty (180) days, for example, or a good cause <br />provision can be included with the notice requirement. The <br />Charter Review Commission is recommending the above good cause <br />provision so that the City can receive the maximum protection <br />possible from late-filed damage suits. However, neither the <br />Charter Review Commission or the City Attorney can state with <br />certainty that this provision will be upheld by Texas courts. The <br />Commission does believe that the suggested provision is reasonable <br />and fair to prospective claimants as well as to the City. <br /> <br />21. Sec. 12.09, Interim municipal government, should be deleted in its <br />entirety since this provision is now obsolete. For historical <br />purposes, original and amended versions of the City <br />Charter are kept in the City's law library. <br /> <br />22. The Charter Review Commission recommends that a non-binding <br />referendum be included on the ballot in May, 1988, concerning <br />changing the City's election system from a place system to a <br />single-member district system, providing a choice of several types <br />of single-member district systems to choose from. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.