Laserfiche WebLink
<br />62 <br /> <br />Regular Meeting <br /> <br />January 25, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Mayor Younger introduced a review of the Report of the Charter Re- <br />view Commission and direction to Staff. No.5 in the Report (Sec. <br />3.04 of Charter) is a non-technical change to provide more flexibi- <br />lity¡ No.7 (Sec. 3.08) had a typographical error corrected¡ Nos. <br />12 and 13 have non-technical changes¡ No. 14 (Sec. 8.17) is a sig- <br />nificant change to allow what state law allows, which at present is <br />$10,000 but would still have to be approved by Council in an Ordinance <br />before it could be implemented¡ No. 15 (Sec. 10.08) is a significant <br />change¡ No. 19 (Sec. 12.02) would provide the campaign contribution <br />statements to be reviewed by the Ethics Review Commission; Nos. 20 <br />(Sec. 12.06) and 22 provide non-technical changes. Mr. Guerra re- <br />quested a listing of cities our size in Texas which have the single- <br />member districting method of voting. Mr. Hankins stated three possi- <br />bilities for systems that could be considered are (1) Mayor at large <br />and six districts; (2) Mayor and 2 Council Members at large and four <br />districts; and (3) seven districts and then the elected officials <br />select the Mayor. Council agreed to offer the types of systems but <br />no timetable as to when it would be implemented if approved by the <br />voters. It was consensus of Council to delete No. 12 (Sec. 7.06) <br />from the Charter Amendments to be placed on the ballot in lieu of <br />adopting an Ordinance dealing with this subject matter. Mr. Robbins <br />suggested signs be placed in yards as notice to citizens. Randy <br />Rogers expressed objection to Nos. 12 and 13 (Sec. 7.09) stating <br />it would bring further delays to projects in an economy that is al- <br />ready suffering. Mr. Stouffer of the Charter Review Commission stated <br />No. 13 (Sec. 7.09) is to protect the community in the change of use of <br />land. It was consensus to place No. 13 in the Ordinance calling-for <br />the election, and for the Council to determine at that time whether <br />to leave it in or delete it as a Charter Amendment. It was consensus <br />for all twenty-two amendments with the exception of the deletion of <br />No. 12 to be placed in the Election Ordinance for consideration <br />February 8. <br /> <br />Mayor Younger introduced for consideration adoption of a Resolution, <br />the caption which was read as follows: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTEN- <br />TION T~ ISSUB CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION. <br /> <br />(For Streets and Drainage purposes in the maximum principal amount <br />not exceeding $1,340,000). Mr. Farr moved for adoption and Ms. <br />Kissler seconded the motion. On roll call the following vote was <br />recorded: <br /> <br />AYE: Brown, Farr, <br />NAY: Younger. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br /> <br />Guerra, Hernandez, Kissler, Nicola. <br /> <br />Mr. Hernandez then moved to reconsider the above Resolution and Ms. <br />Kissler seconded the motion. On roll call the following vote was <br />recorded: <br /> <br />AYE: Brown, <br />NAY: None. <br />ABSTAIN: Guerra. <br /> <br />Farr, Younger, Hernandez, Kissler, Nicola. <br />