My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11141988 Regular Meeting
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
1980 s
>
1988
>
11141988 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2007 3:46:23 PM
Creation date
12/2/2003 2:38:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
City Clerk - Type
Regular Meeting
Date
11/14/1988
Volume Book
93
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />42 <br /> <br />Regular Meeting <br /> <br />November 14, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />The Council then considered Items 9.D. (8) and (9), adoption of <br />two Resolutions removed from the consensus agenda. t1r. Brown <br />moved to table consideration of the Resolutions until after <br />Executive Session and Ms. Kissler seconded the motion, which <br />passed unanimously. <br /> <br />Mayor Morris introduced for consideration authorization for <br />Sawtelle, Goode, Davidson & Troila to appeal the final order of <br />the Public Utility Commission of Texas in Docket No. 8032 and to <br />intervene on the City of San Marcos' behalf in the latest LCRA <br />rate filing case, Public Utility Commission of Texas, Docket No. <br />8400. Mr. Gilley advised the Council on November 6, LCRA filed a <br />new rate case with PUC for a 17.7% increase. Fred Saffer and <br />John Davidson have reviewed the case and state the figures are <br />misleading and think LCRA has overestimated the impact of the SWT <br />co-generation plant on San Marcos. One significant point is that <br />the filing is based on the collapsed voltage rate. Mr. Gilley <br />thinks the City is obligated to take action authorizing <br />intervention. There was a savings of $600,000 annually by our <br />participation in the last intervention. Mayor Morris moved to <br />appeal PUC 8032 and to intervene in the rate case 8400 and Mr. <br />Moore seconded the motion. Mr. Gilley stated there are some <br />funds budgeted which could be used for our costs involved, and <br />that he estimated $60,000-$65,000 in legal fees, <br />$150,000-$175,000 in consulting fees. The Council voted <br />unanimously for approval of Mayor Morris' motion. <br /> <br />Mayor Morris introduced a discussion by Norwood Properties <br />regarding a community facilities agreement and direction to <br />Staff. David Taylor, a partner with Norwood Properties, stated <br />they were working on a roadway proposal through River Ridge and <br />had submitted it to Staff for review. He stated the needed <br />easements are in hand and Union Pacific has given preliminary <br />approval. He stated they would want reimbursement of the roadway <br />over the railroad crossing, estimated to be $138,000 and suggests <br />the City reimburse them through rebates on development fees in <br />River Ridge over a 10-year period of time. Mr. Hankins stated <br />capital recovery fees could not be used for railroad crossing <br />improvements and building permits go into the general fund, and <br />that this is an unusual proposal. Mayor Morris directed Staff to <br />look at the feasibility of the proposal. <br /> <br />Mr. Hernandez moved the Council adjourn into Executive Session <br />pursuant to Article 6252-17, Sections 2(e) and (g), V.A.C.S., to <br />discuss matters where the duties of the City Attorney to the City <br />pursuant to the Code of Professional Responsibility of the State <br />Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Article 6252-17; and <br />evaluation and duties of a public officer or employee, <br />respectively, and Mr. Guerra seconded the motion, which passed <br />unanimously (9:13 p.m.). <br /> <br />Ms. Kissler moved the Council reconvene at 11:05 p.m. and ~IT. <br />Plummer seconded the motion, which passed unanimously (Mr. Moore <br />not present to vote on this item). <br /> <br />Mayor Morris introduced for consideration Item 9.D.(8), adoption <br />of a Resolution, the caption which was read as follows: <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, <br />APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF A CONTRACT FOR <br />ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING SERVICES WITH PRO-TECH ENGINEERING <br />GROUP, INC. IN CONNECTION WITH THE 1988 VICTORY GARDENS <br />PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, AUTHORIZING THE <br />MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF SAID CITY AND <br />DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DA'I'E. <br /> <br />Ms. Kissler moved for adoption of the Resolution and Mr. Plummer <br />seconded the motion. Ms. Kissler moved to amend the contract on <br />Page 8 to add the following language to Section 1.6 at the end of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.