Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2 <br /> <br />Special Meeting <br /> <br />February 2, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />some of the amendments to the Codes. Mr. Robbins advised the Council <br />some of the amendments are for the purpose of making the Codes more <br />applicable to our needs, and not necessarily. is more expense involved. <br />Mayor Younger stated he does not want matters more restrictive than <br />is necessary. Mr. Gonzalez asked if future amendments to Codes would <br />apply to the MUD, and Mayor Younger stated they would not. Mr. Hankins <br />advised the Council the purpose in language being added to the agree- <br />ment is to eliminate nonconformities for future annexation purposes. <br />Regarding Section 2.01 regarding Landscaping, Mr. Hankins wants the <br />MUD to comply to the substantive provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. <br />Regarding Section 2.02 Mr. Gonzalez stated he wants the Architectural <br />Control Committee to be required to notify the City of their meeting <br />and the City to have a representative attend the meetings. Mr. Lewis <br />stated they would agree to work on language that the Planning Depart- <br />ment will review and for there to be an arbitrage procedure if they do <br />not revi,ew. Mr. Lewis stated the Architectural Control Committee would <br />be willing to make the City aware of their variances but are not willing <br />to make the City Planner a voting member of the Committee. They are <br />willing to provide notice of their meetings. There was no resolution <br />whether or not the City Planner would be able to vote as a member of <br />the Architectural Control Committee. Mr. Hankins ~ated the MUD is in <br />agreement to complying with the substantive but not the procedural <br />Ordinances of the City. Regarding Section 3.03 Mr. Nicola does not <br />agree with the $10,000 per acre figure at this time (Mr. Guerra left <br />the meeting at this time - 7:00 p.m.). Mr. Lewis stated he is willing <br />to work on this arrangement, and Mr. Nicola stated he would have no <br />problem with what the School agrees to be acceptable. Messrs. Coddington, <br />Farr, and Ms. Kissler stated the $10,000 per acre figure was accept- <br />able to them, and Mayor Younger stated it was acceptable to him, sub- <br />ject to negotiation to lower if it is needed. Regarding Section 3.04 <br />the question of the property being contiguous or not and who will main- <br />tain the parkland until such time as the City annexes the property need <br />to be resolved. Mr. Gonzalez stated the MUD is willing to maintain the <br />parkland until the City exercises its option to do so. On roll call <br />the following vote was recorded: <br /> <br />AYE: <br /> <br />Coddington, Farr, Younger, Kissler. <br /> <br />NAY: <br /> <br />Nicola. <br /> <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />Mayor Younger introduced for consideration approval of an Ordinance <br />on second reading, the caption which was read as follows: <br /> <br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN <br />1-'1ARCOS, TEXAS, GRANTING THE CONSENT OF THE CITY OF <br />SAN MARCOS TO THE CREATION OF A MUNICIPAL UTILITY <br />DISTRICT; LOWMAN RANCH MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT <br />SUBJECT TO VARIOUS TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN <br />A SEPARATE AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE CREATION AND <br />OPERATION OF SAID DISTRICT (CONSENT AGREEMENT) WHICH <br />IS MADE A PART OF THIS ORDINANCE, AUTHORIZING THE <br />MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT, AND DECLARING AN <br />EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Ms. Kissler moved for approval of the Ordinance on second reading and <br />Mr. Farr seconded the motion. The Council reviewed unresolved issues <br />stated in Mr. Hankins' memorandum to the Council dated January 30, <br />1987 as well as other provisions. Mr. Nicola stated he would try to <br />communicate with <br />