Laserfiche WebLink
<br />70 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Regular Meeting September 12, 1992 Page 2 <br /> <br />approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting held September 28, 1992, <br />to adopt the Ordinance on third and final reading, to adopt the <br />remaining three Resolutions, to approve the two Change Orders, and <br />to approve the street closure (Mayor Morris abstaining to Item <br />5.D.[1] - Change Order No. 27 cited above, because of a conflict of <br />interest with her husband's interest with Stokes) and Mr. Guerra <br />seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. The captions of the <br />Ordinance and Resolutions read as follows: <br /> <br />Adoption of Ordinance on third and final reading: -- <br />! <br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, , <br />TEXAS, ESTABLISHING A NO PARKING TOW-AWAY ZONE ON THE WEST SIDE <br />OF MOON STREET; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; REPEALING ALL <br />CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A PENALTY; PROVIDING FOR <br />PUBLICATION AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Adoption of Resolutions: <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, <br />TEXAS, APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF STANDARD UTILITY <br />AND JOINT USE AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE TEXAS <br />DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR RELOCATION OF SAN MARCOS <br />ELECTRIC UTILITY FACILITIES IN CONNECTION WITH THE IH-35 AND <br />THE COMAL COUNTY LINE; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO 'EXECUTE <br />THE AGREEMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY; AND DECLARING AN <br />EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, <br />TEXAS, APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT <br />BETWEEN THE CITY AND BAND ERA COUNTY FOR THE LEASING OF OFFICE <br />SPACE FOR THE WIC PROGRAM IN BANDERA COUNTY; AUTHORIZING THE <br />CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT; AND DECLARING AN <br />EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, <br />TEXAS, APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT <br />BETWEEN THE SAN MARCOS CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT <br />AND THE CITY FOR SCHOOL CROSSING GUARDS; AUTHORIZING THE CITY <br />MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY; AND <br />DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Mayor Morris introduced for consideration Item 5.C. (4) removed from <br />the consensus agenda, adoption of a Resolution, the caption which <br />was read as follows: <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, <br />TEXAS, SOLICITING SUPPORT FROM THE GOVERNING BODIES OF ALL <br />TAXING UNITS ENTITLED TO VOTE ON THE APPOINTMENT OF BOARD <br />MEMBERS FOR THE HAYS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT TO OPPOSE THE <br />ACCEPTANCE BY THE DISTRICT OF A 1.5 ACRE TRACT OF LAND FROM THE <br />HAYS CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT TO BE USED FOR <br />THE PURPOSE OF RELOCATING THE APPRAISAL DISTRICT'S OFFICES BY <br />EITHER RESCINDING ANY SUPPORTIVE ACTION HERETOFORE TAKEN OR <br />RESOLVING TO OPPOSE THIS PURCHASE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE <br />DATE. <br /> <br />Ms. Kissler moved for adoption of the Resolution and Mr. Hart <br />seconded the motion. Mr. Moore stated he would abstain from voting <br />on this matter, because he is the City's representative to the CAD <br />Board. Mr. Gilley stated the reasons for opposing the relocation <br />are: (1) they are more centrally located at the present site in <br />center of population of County, (2) they have not needed additional <br />space [large space at present location not used for a long period of <br />time] and the present space can be remodeled to suit their needs, <br />and (3) the CAD stated they preferred to own rather than lease <br />property - The present facility is owned by the taxpayers, and city <br />has no need for that space in the immediate future. Mr. Gilley <br />stated the commitment should be amortized until the cost of the <br />facility is taken care of. Judy Allen, CAD Board Member, stated <br />they need 9,000-10,000 square feet, and the present space or the <br />proposed new space would suit their purposes. She stated they need <br />more than six months notice if they need to vacate the City's space, <br />because it would not be sufficient notice to relocate. Mayor Morris <br />