Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 23 <br /> Regular Meeting May 11, 1992 Page 2 <br /> Commission had done to formulate the proposal. Mr. Cunningham <br /> stated this process was an attempt to resolve the long standing <br /> tensions in the community between the Greek residential housing <br /> and neighborhood groups. The plan was a framework that <br /> combined both land use and public health and safety for the <br /> community. George Von Der Lippe, Greater San Marcos Area <br /> Council of Neighborhood Associations, thanked the Council for <br /> addressing the long standing conflict in the neighborhoods <br /> between the neighbors and some of the Greek organizations. <br /> Mr. Von Der Lippe stated a neighborhood survey was conducted of <br /> all citizens who lived within 600 feet of a Greek house. The <br /> survey was done jointly between the University and the City. <br /> The Neighborhood Council would like the City Council to adopt <br /> the ordinance as presented, and give the City staff the <br /> resources to enforce this ordinance. Mr. Hart questioned if <br /> the neighborhood representatives met separately from the zoning <br /> commission to discuss the proposed ordinance. Mr. Von Der <br /> Lippe said they had conducted a meeting on the ordinance and <br /> they had a consensus on their position. Ms. Jan Cole, House <br /> Corporation for Delta Gamma Sorority, stated that she did not <br /> feel the Council had the intention of removing the Greek system <br /> from the City; however, financially there would be a tremendous <br /> impact. There were several million dollars that were spent by <br /> the Greek organizations in the community, and that the <br /> University would lose some of the young people who would come <br /> to the University to participate in Greek life and who could <br /> not afford this opportunity at other schools. She stated <br /> there was discriminatory wording in the ordinance, particularly <br /> when it had to do with hours which one might use the property, <br /> and the fact some members may be prohibited from being on the <br /> property at given times. (All members were paying members for <br /> the rent of the house and the property. She stated the <br /> sororities were being limited for things they could not <br /> control). Mr. Ed Milhawkin, Facility Advisors Round Table for <br /> the Greek System, stated he would like to see some changes to <br /> the Ordinance. section 35 (H) (4) (a) indicated that <br /> organizations already fulfilling the obligations would have to <br /> resubmit a new specific use permit. Section 35(H) (4)(c}2, the <br /> fire codes and other codes, were a concern of the owners of the <br /> housing units, not the renters. This section should only apply <br /> to organizations who own their facility. Section <br /> 35(H) (4) (c)3-4, the fire and building inspectors, should be the <br /> only ones to establish the maximum number of total occupancy <br /> permitted. In Section 35(H) (4) (c)5, the Chief of Police should <br /> not have to be notif ied 48 hours before the function, due to <br /> the fact he would not have to do any advance preparations. In <br /> section 35(H) (4) 9-10 citations should state, II in <br /> . . . assessment of penalty points if any member of the organization <br /> was issued a citation or arrested," not for just any person, <br /> such as guest. Members being assessed should also hold true <br /> for section 35(H) (4) (c)8 relating to parking. Section <br /> 35(H) (4) (c)ll gives the Zoning commission the ability to <br /> rewrite the law in the future without any recourse. Process of <br /> appeal through the municipal court judge was appreciated. <br /> Robert Cotner, representing the pi Kappa Alpha Housing <br /> Corporation, stated the main problem was doing away with the <br /> grandfather clause. Their main complaint was on the parking. <br /> Under the current regulations, they were in compliance with the <br /> parking. If the ordinance passed they would not be in <br /> compliance with the parking. (Letter dated 3/5/86). Mr. Cotner <br /> stated there were "loop-holes" all through the ordinance: <br /> Page 3, Item 6 " the party shall end no later than 11:00 <br /> . . . <br /> p.m. , " and he added whose to say the party cannot begin at <br /> 12:01 a.m. the next day. The ordinance did not specify if <br /> fraternities/sororities were resident houses or assembly <br /> houses, it would make a difference on how the chief building <br /> inspector would give the certificate of occupancy for the <br /> number and the wiring, plumbing, etc. In which case the newer <br /> fraternities/sororities would have to change their doors. <br /> Mayor Morris questioned Mr. Gilley if these houses were always <br />