Laserfiche WebLink
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-116 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS, MAIGNG <br />FINDINGS AS TO THE ADVISABILITY OF THE IMPROVEMENTS <br />PROPOSED IN THE TRACE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT IN <br />ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 372 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL <br />GOVERNMENT CODE. <br />WHEREAS, the City of San Marcos, Texas (the "City"), is authorized under Chapter <br />372 of the Texas Local Government Code, as amended (the "Act "), to create a public <br />improvement district; <br />WHEREAS, on June 4, 2015, Highpointe Investments, Inc. ( "Highpointe "), submitted <br />and filed with the City Clerk of the City a petition ( "Petition ") requesting the establishment of a <br />public improvement district to be known as the Trace Public Improvement District ( "District "); <br />WHEREAS, the Petition indicated that (i) the owners of more than 50% of the appraised <br />value of the taxable real property liable for assessment and (ii) the owners of more than 50% of <br />the area of all taxable real property liable for assessment within the District executed the Petition <br />requesting that the governing body of the City (the "City Council ") create the District; <br />WHEREAS, the City Council has investigated and determined that the facts contained in <br />the Petition are true and correct; <br />WHEREAS, the District will include the approximately 417.630 acres owned by the <br />Owner and located within the City and the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction (the "Property"), <br />which Property is more particularly described and depicted on "Exhibit A" attached hereto and <br />made a part hereof, <br />WHEREAS, after providing all notices required by Section 372.009 of the Act, the City <br />Council on September 1, 2015 conducted a public hearing on the advisability of the proposed <br />improvements; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Council adjourned and closed such public hearing. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE <br />CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS, THAT: <br />Section 1. The findings set forth in the recitals of this Resolution are hereby found to be true <br />and correct. <br />Section 2. The Petition submitted to the City by the Owner was filed with the City Clerk of <br />the City and complies with Subchapter A of the Act. <br />Section 3. Pursuant to the requirements of the Act, including, without limitation, Sections <br />372.006, 372.009(a), and 372.009(b), the City Council, after considering the Petition and the <br />