My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 2016-032/Water Reuse Asset Management Plan
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Res 2016-032/Water Reuse Asset Management Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2016 10:44:26 AM
Creation date
3/28/2016 8:46:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Approving
Number
2016-32
Date
3/15/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of San Marcos <br />Water Reuse System <br />Asset Management Plan <br />Figure 5.3 - San Marcos Reuse Facility Assets Relative Risk Profile <br />5.3 San Marcos Reuse System Pipeline Relative Risk Results <br />A similar risk analysis was performed for the reuse system pipelines based on the risk matrix <br />shown in Table 5.2 using a GIS -based risk analysis tool. The analysis computed the LOF, COF, <br />and ROF scores for all 58 individual reuse pipeline segments. Table 5.4 summarizes the LOF, <br />COF, ROF and Risk Rank for each reuse pipeline segment which is also illustrated in Figure <br />5.4. Table 5.4 presents the risk results in terms of total linear footage in the San Marcos <br />system and Figure 5.5 provides a map of the reuse pipeline segments with their corresponding <br />low risk (green), medium risk (yellow), and high risk (red) color designations. <br />Most of the City's reuse pipeline assets fall into the medium or low risk categories. Five line <br />segments on the Hays Energy reuse line were consider high risk based on Risk of Failure <br />scores above 4.0. The higher risk scores on these line segments were caused by the relatively <br />high Consequence of Failure (COF) scores for these particular line segments. While it is <br />typically difficult to mitigate high COF scores, these assets may warrant more frequent <br />monitoring and inspection to maintain their condition and avoid potential failure. <br />February 2016 Page 29 <br />Reuse System Relative Risk Profile <br />9 <br />8 <br />7 <br />6 <br />�u <br />v <br />,R <br />5 <br />LL <br />��Low Risk <br />0 <br />W <br />4 <br />Medium Risk <br />c <br />High Risk <br />3 <br />r- <br />0 <br />U <br />2 <br />1 <br />0 <br />0 <br />1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 <br />9 <br />Likelihood of Failure <br />Figure 5.3 - San Marcos Reuse Facility Assets Relative Risk Profile <br />5.3 San Marcos Reuse System Pipeline Relative Risk Results <br />A similar risk analysis was performed for the reuse system pipelines based on the risk matrix <br />shown in Table 5.2 using a GIS -based risk analysis tool. The analysis computed the LOF, COF, <br />and ROF scores for all 58 individual reuse pipeline segments. Table 5.4 summarizes the LOF, <br />COF, ROF and Risk Rank for each reuse pipeline segment which is also illustrated in Figure <br />5.4. Table 5.4 presents the risk results in terms of total linear footage in the San Marcos <br />system and Figure 5.5 provides a map of the reuse pipeline segments with their corresponding <br />low risk (green), medium risk (yellow), and high risk (red) color designations. <br />Most of the City's reuse pipeline assets fall into the medium or low risk categories. Five line <br />segments on the Hays Energy reuse line were consider high risk based on Risk of Failure <br />scores above 4.0. The higher risk scores on these line segments were caused by the relatively <br />high Consequence of Failure (COF) scores for these particular line segments. While it is <br />typically difficult to mitigate high COF scores, these assets may warrant more frequent <br />monitoring and inspection to maintain their condition and avoid potential failure. <br />February 2016 Page 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.