My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02141994 Regular Meeting
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
1990 s
>
1994
>
02141994 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2007 9:39:58 AM
Creation date
12/1/2003 12:50:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
City Clerk - Type
Regular Meeting
Date
2/14/1994
Volume Book
114
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> . 69L <br /> Page 13 <br /> disadvantages of having separate planning and zoning commissions, <br /> including delays to applicants, increased staff time and potential <br /> policy conflicts, outweigh the advantages, including a greater <br /> planning emphasis and splitting the potentially large caseload <br /> between two commissions. These revisions simply combine the two <br /> commissions and consolidate their duties and authority. We also <br /> agree with the Planning and Zoning Commissions that the combined <br /> commission should have eleven members. While the proposed <br /> revisions are silent on the topic of the transition from two <br /> commissions with fourteen members to a single commission with <br /> eleven, we believe this can be handled through the annual <br /> appointment process for the two commissions in July of 1994 if the <br /> revisions are approved by the voters. <br /> 9. Amend Section 12.03 as follows: <br /> ~ ~ã ~J§Æ~i;~~, ~ ¿~f ~ 'j:;;;:: :::: :::1:,8 ÞiÊi~: S,l ãJlj~L,; 1;;, %PR J,: :~giE;;;;:¡i É g:; I¡:;;;g ~R,g æ; * ~j~~J;;¡;;~ i !ì~;í;i <br /> A---- <br /> Sec. J.2.03. Ncpotiom. ~ <br /> <br /> No peroon rel;:¡ted ~li thin the oecond degree by ;:¡ffinity, or <br /> 'i:ithin the third degree by cono;:¡nguinity to ;:¡ny elected officer <br /> of the city, or to the city m;:¡n;:¡ger, oh;:¡ll be ;:¡ppointed to ;:¡ny <br /> office, pooition or clerJcohip or other oer7ice of the city, <br /> pro".rided, th;:¡t nothing herein cont;:¡ined, oh;:¡ll prcl'ent the <br /> ;:¡ppointment, 7oting for, or confirm;:¡tion of ;:¡ny peroon 'i:ho oh;:¡ll <br /> h;:¡ ",re been continuouoly employed in ;:¡ny ouch office, pooition, <br /> clerJcohip, employment or duty for ;:¡ period of t'ilO (2) ye;:¡ro <br /> prior to the election or ;:¡ppointment of the officer or member <br /> .:lppointing, voting for, or confi~ming the ;:¡ppointment, or the <br /> election or ;:¡ppointment of the officer or member rel;:¡ted to ouch <br /> employee in the prohibited degree. <br /> <br /> state law on nepotism, chapter 473 of the Texas Government Code, <br /> has effectively superseded our Charter section, and only the <br /> persons to whom the nepotism principles apply is left open to local <br /> definition. Presently, only the city council members and city <br /> manager are covered. The Charter Review Commission recommends the <br /> rewriting of this section to include the city secretary, city <br /> attorney and municipal court judge within this coverage. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.