My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08.15.2017 Regular Meeting
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
2010's
>
2017
>
08.15.2017 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2017 10:18:01 AM
Creation date
10/13/2017 9:21:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Meeting Minutes August 15,2017 <br /> is vaguely written, and doesn't provide clear boundaries for elected officials <br /> and city employees. Public officials are left in doubt about actions that could <br /> make them personally liable for thousands of dollars in civil penalties or <br /> removal from office for merely expressing an opinion that is protected by the <br /> First Amendment. We hope the pending lawsuit will address these concerns <br /> and give our community members,staff and elected officials peace of mind <br /> and clear boundaries. <br /> The City Council continues to weigh the issues surrounding SB 4, and as a part <br /> of our process we have obtained advice from our legal team, professional <br /> organizations and our city's legislative consultants. We believe the some of the <br /> facts they shared with us, should be shared with you. <br /> 1. Many of you are aware that there is a lawsuit pending before United States <br /> District Judge Orlando Garcia that will resolve the constitutional issues that <br /> have been raised regarding SB 4. His ruling will apply state-wide to all cities, <br /> even those that have not intervened in the case... including San Marcos. <br /> 2. The City has been very careful about public statements regarding SB 4. The <br /> way the bill is written, official criticism of the bill could, in itself, be construed <br /> as a violation of SB 4. Unless such statement is revoked before September 1st, <br /> any policy statement,whether formal or informal, by an employee or elected <br /> official that is believed to "materially limit the enforcement of immigration <br /> laws" can result in that person's removal from office and subject them to <br /> thousands of dollars in civil penalties. <br /> 3. Cities across the state have also expressed concerns about the loss of state <br /> and federal grant funds by those communities that publicly denounce SB 4. <br /> The state and federal funds the City of San Marcos receives provide <br /> much-needed benefits for our community including H.U.D. DR funds to help <br /> us recover from the devastating floods in 2015, public safety grants to keep our <br /> community safe, along with many others. <br /> 4. Communities across Texas have also expressed concerns that public <br /> statements denouncing SB 4 or expressing unwillingness to cooperate with the <br /> U.S. immigration authorities could lead to increased ICE raids focused on <br /> individuals who are not suspected of committing any crime. <br /> The City Council has absorbed this information; we have listened and heard <br /> the comments our community members have made. We hope this information <br /> clarifies our concerns surrounding SB 4, and our concerns for the City of San <br /> Marcos and those who live here. <br /> City of San Marcos Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.