Laserfiche WebLink
102 <br />Regular Meeting April 12, 1999 Page 4 <br />hearing. Mr. Moseley moved for approval of the Ordinance on first reading <br />and Ms. Hughson seconded the motion. Mr. Doiron asked if the Advisory <br />Commission would be selected before or after the utility is in place. Mr. <br />Gilley stated if the Council wishes to appoint the Commission after <br />adoption of the Ordinance, then it will be in place before the utility is <br />operational. Mr. Moseley asked why the size of the Commission had been <br />reduced from five to three, and Mr. Taylor stated it was scaled down <br />because of their limited function. Mr. Moseley stated he felt the <br />Commission needed to be at least five to be representative of geographical <br />locations. Mr. Doiron was in favor of seven members, and Ms. Hughson <br />agreed. Mr. Mihalkanin was in favor of five. Mr. Moseley stated he wants <br />to see how the City is divided before a final decision is made. Ms. <br />Hughson then moved to amend the Ordinance on Page 6 in Section 2.191 from <br />three members to seven members and Mr. Doiron seconded the motion. On <br />roll call the following vote was recorded: <br />AYE: Hughson, Doiron, Cox. <br />NAY: Mihalkanin, Moseley, Hernandez. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />The motion failed. Mr. Moseley then moved to amend Page 6 in Section <br />2.191 from three members to five members and Mr. Hernandez seconded the <br />motion, which passed unanimously. Ms. Hughson then moved to amend Page 6 <br />in Section 2.191 for the members to have two-year staggered terms and Mr. <br />Mihalkanin seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. Ms. Hughson <br />then asked for clarification on Page 4 in Section 86.505(d) regarding each <br />unit, not property, will be built with one ERU. Mr. Moseley wants more <br />clarification regarding this Ordinance from Steve Jenkins at the next <br />meeting. Mr. Gilley stated all readings.of the Ordinance could be left <br />off the consent agenda, so the Council could continue to discuss the <br />Ordinance. The Council then voted unanimously for approval of the <br />Ordinance on first reading. <br />Mr. Cox introduced for consideration adoption of an Ordinance on <br />emergency, the caption which was read as follows: <br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS,.TEXAS, <br />AMENDING THE CITY BUDGET ORDINANCE FOR THE 1998-99 FISCAL YEAR TO <br />PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THE SAN MARCOS MUNICIPAL FACILITIES RENOVATIONS <br />PHASE III PROJECT; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. <br />Mr. Hernandez moved for adoption of the Ordinance on emergency and Mr. <br />Doiron seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. <br />Mr. Cox introduced for consideration reconsideration of a Zoning <br />Ordinance. The Council did not wish to reconsider the Zoning Ordinance. <br />The caption of the Ordinance reads as follows: <br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS, <br />AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY BY REZONING A 1.38 ACRE <br />TRACT OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1328 I.H.35 NORTH FROM "C" (COMMERCIAL <br />DISTRICT) TO "MF-4" (MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT); INCLUDING <br />PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES. <br />Mr. Cox introduced for consideration approval of minutes of the Regular <br />Meeting held March 22, 1999, approval of two Ordinances on second reading, <br />adoption of one Ordinance on third and final reading, adoption of twelve <br />Resolutions and approval of Change Order No. 6 in the amount of $29,285.00 <br />in connection with the San Marcos Municipal Facilities ADA Renovations <br />Phase III for a replacement roof for the San Marcos Electric Utility <br />Building on consensus. The Council removed Items 9.D.(1), 9.D.(6) and