My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04.17.18 Work Session
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
2010's
>
2018
>
04.17.18 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2018 10:42:38 AM
Creation date
5/7/2018 10:42:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
City Clerk - Type
Workshops
Date
4/17/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Meeting Minutes April 17,2018 <br /> Mr. Hairell provided that the Federal Transit Funding requires local funds or <br /> "match". He stated that operating assistance match requirement 50% Federal <br /> to 50% Local and capital improvement assistance match requirement 80% <br /> Federal to 20% Local. The City of San Marcos local match contributions for <br /> FY17-18 is $450,000. This has been the same for the last 3 years. Mr. Hairell <br /> reviewed what a Direct Recipient for Federal and State transit funding <br /> allocated to the San Marcos UZA. He defined Direct Recipient and Urban <br /> Transit District(UTD). Mr. Hairell reviewed the process for becoming a Direct <br /> Recipient. <br /> Mr. Hairell provided the outcomes of becoming a Direct Recipient(DR),and <br /> also reviewed transit partnerships and model options. He provided two <br /> different types of models: Direct Recipient enters into an Interlocal Agreement <br /> & Direct Recipient with Subrecipient.Mr. Cobb provided that the City and <br /> Texas State have already submitted a joint RFQ for a consultant that will look <br /> into what would be the most advantageous for the two organizations related to <br /> transit structures models.The two entities have agreed to pay for this <br /> consultant jointly. <br /> Mr. Lumbreras provided that the DR is a big issue, but we have to determine <br /> who is going to be the main recipient. He stated that the individuals that will <br /> be contracted will be able to provide us with the best overall model option for <br /> both entities. Discussion was held regarding the possibility of CAPMETRO <br /> providing service in San Marcos.Nancy Nusbaum,Texas State University, <br /> provided that they are covering their costs now with some going into reserve, <br /> but their contract requires that the driver wage be increased by$1 each year. <br /> They are only allowed to charge students$95 per semester for the <br /> transportation fee and can only raise it to$100, but it would require a student <br /> referendum to increase it that$5 amount. When the system begins to not pay <br /> for itself the University may have to look at cutting service. <br /> Following statements and discussion the City Council provided consensus for <br /> Staff to start moving forward with becoming a Direct Recipient,and directed <br /> Staff to move forward with working with the consultant in conjunction with <br /> Texas State to evaluate transit partnerships and model options. Staff will place <br /> an update on the August 7 meeting agenda. Council provided consensus for <br /> Staff to prioritize the Direct Recipient information over the results from the <br /> consultant related to transit structure models. <br /> EXECUTIVE SESSION <br /> 2. Executive Session in accordance with § 551.071 - Consultation with Attorney: Discuss <br /> City of San Marcos Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.