Laserfiche WebLink
C <br /> a <br /> DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURE' <br /> 7. The location of any required or proposed residential infill B. If the Director determines that proposed amendments <br /> compatibility standard under Section 4.4.2.5; substantially impact the nature of the approval,whether <br /> individually or cumulatively,the Director will deny the request <br /> 8. The location and type of all required and proposed street for approval of the modifications and provide the applicant with <br /> types under Section 3.7.1.1; the opportunity to revise the proposed amendments to bring <br /> 9. The location of all proposed parking in accordance with them into compliance with the existing neighborhood regulating <br /> Section 7.1.1.1; plan. <br /> 10. The location and type of all proposed and existing C. If an applicant wishes to make any amendments other than <br /> streestcape types under Section 3.8.1.1;and minor amendments approved by the Responsible Official,the <br /> amendments will be submitted for review and approval as a <br /> 11. The location and type of all proposed and existing parkland revised existing neighborhood regulating plan. <br /> under Section 3.10.1.1. <br /> D. Minor amendments shall be as follows: <br /> Section 2.5.3.3 Approval Process <br /> 1. Corrections in spelling,distances and other labeling that <br /> A. The approval process for an existing neighborhood regulating do not affect the overall development concept; <br /> plan follows the procedures established for approval of a <br /> zoning map amendment under Section 2.5.1.3. 2. Changes in building position or layout that are less than <br /> ten feet or ten percent of the total building project or area; <br /> Section 2.5.3.4 Criteria for Approval and <br /> A. The following criteria shall be used to determine whether the 3. Changes in proposed property lines as long as the original <br /> application for an existing neighborhood regulating plan shall be total project acreage is not exceeded,and the area of <br /> approved, conditionally approved or denied: any base zoning district is not changed by more than five <br /> 1. The proposed regulating plan conforms with the percent. <br /> compatibility of uses and density standards in Section 4. Changes in parking layouts as long as the general original <br /> 4.1.2.5. design is maintained. <br /> 2. The existing neighborhood regulating plan is consistent <br /> with all applicable standards and requirements of the base DIVISION 4: APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT OR HISTORIC <br /> zoning district and this development code; LANDMARK <br /> 3. The existing neighborhood regulating plan is consistent Section 2.5.4.1 Establishment and Expansion of Local <br /> with any adopted small area plan or neighborhood Historic Districts or Historic Landmarks <br /> character study for the area. A. General Procedures for Local Historic District.Except as <br /> 4. The proposed provision and configuration of roads, provided in this Section, an application to establish or expand <br /> electric,water,wastewater, drainage and park facilities a Historic District(HD) shall be processed and decided in <br /> conform to the Comprehensive Plan and any approved accordance with the procedures governing an application for <br /> City Master Plans or Capital Improvement Plans; an overlay district under Section 2.5.2.2. <br /> Section 2.5.3.5 Amendments B. General Procedures for Historic Landmarks.Except as <br /> provided in this Section, an application to establish a Historic <br /> A. The Responsible Official may permit the applicant to make Landmark shall be processed and decided in accordance with <br /> minor amendments to the existing neighborhood regulating the procedures governing an application for a Zoning Map <br /> plan without the necessity of amending the ordinance that amendment under Section 2.5.1.1. <br /> established the existing neighborhood regulating plan. <br /> 2:30 San Marcos Development Code Adopted April 17,2018 <br />