Laserfiche WebLink
<br />134. <br />Regular Meeting <br /> <br />April 9, 2001 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />Mayor Chiu introduced for consideration Item 24 removed from the consent <br />agenda, remove from table and consider adoption of Resolution, the caption <br />which was read as follows: <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS, <br />AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE SAN MARCOS ACTIVITY CENTER REMODELING AND <br />EXPANSION PROJECT TO STOKES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY USA, L.C.; <br />AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ON <br />BEHALF OF THE CITY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Mr. Moseley moved for adoption of the Resolution and Mr. Doiron seconded <br />the motion. Ms. Hughson thanked Staff for the memorandum provided at the <br />Council meeting showing exactly what is being changed. Mr. Cobb stated <br />$700,000 is for construction and some funds have previously been set aside <br />for equipment. Mr Doiron stated this funding is overage from the original <br />design, and he wants voters to determine how this money should be spent. <br />Mr. Moseley agreed. Mr. Mayhew stated this is a difficult decision the <br />Council needs to reach, and he is ready to vote on this matter. Mr. Cox <br />stated the public has provided input and there was an overwhelming <br />sentiment to do this project. Mr. Cox stated the Activity Center and the <br />Library stand out as items that are accepted, and expansion of the <br />Activity Center also would be. Mr. Cox asked Staff if anything proposed <br />was unique to San Marcos, or if commonplace and similar activities to <br />other cities were planned, and he was advised there is nothing unique to <br />San Marcos. Ms. Tatum stated she was received telephone calls regarding <br />this proposed expansion, and the majority of the calls have been opposed. <br />The main issue expressed has been to not compete with other businesses. <br />Surveys at the Activity Center by citizens who use the Center have asked <br />for a weight room, which would bring the City into competition with <br />existing businesses. Ms. Tatum stated she wants this matter decided by <br />the voters if a majority of the City Council want to do this. Mr. Moseley <br />moved to bring this matter before the voters for decision whether or not <br />to provide a weight room and Mr. Doiron seconded the motion. Mr. Doiron <br />stated we need to ask voters if they want the expansion or to pay back on <br />the bonded indebtedness. Mr. Cox stated it was the will of the voters to <br />have the Activity Center and would be a good expenditure to have the <br />expansion. Ms. Tatum stated the City would then be in competition with <br />business, particularly with the addition of weights. The Council <br />discussed logistics and potential expenses of placing this matter on a <br />ballot. On roll call of Mr. Moseley's amendment, the following vote was <br />recorded: <br /> <br />AYE: <br /> <br />Doiron, Moseley, Chiu, Tatum. <br /> <br />NAY: <br /> <br />Hughson, Cox, Mayhew. <br /> <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />The motion passed. Ms. Hughson stated more information will be needed. <br />The Council was advised they will need to reject all bids, and Mr. Cobb <br />