My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ord 2019-012/adopting the 2019 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
02 Ordinances
>
2010's
>
2019
>
Ord 2019-012/adopting the 2019 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2019 5:04:43 PM
Creation date
6/21/2019 4:32:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Ordinances
City Clerk - Type
Adopting
Number
2019-12
Date
5/21/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
304
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Action FF-1.5. Conduct an evaluation to consider the establishment <br /> of fees for parking along the riverfront parks system. <br /> The City of New Braunfels collects almost $300,000 to $500,000 in annual <br /> revenue which goes to parks system improvements and security.These <br /> funds are placed in a special revenue account.As the City of San Marcos <br /> and the surrounding region continue to grow, the use of the riverfront <br /> parks system will increase along with the demand for parking.The City <br /> can benefit from this increased use by charging for parking in this area. <br /> The defined parking areas identified in Appendix C, on page C-3, provide <br /> the opportunity to establish paid parking for peak season access to the <br /> riverfront parks system. <br /> Action FF-1.6. Explore additional ways to improve cost recovery in <br /> the riverfront parks. <br /> This could include more pavilions and picnic shelters that can be <br /> rented. Set out in Figure 3.19, How Important Do You Think the Following <br /> Considerations Are?, are the responses that show that survey respondents <br /> are supportive of charging an entrance or parking fee per vehicle for non- <br /> residents for the riverfront parks.This fee would be one way to improve <br /> cost recovery at these parks. Some survey respondents also indicated <br /> that they would like there to be an entrance fee per vehicle for all visitors <br /> at the riverfront parks which would be another way to improve cost <br /> recovery. <br /> Action FF-1.7. Consider establishing a voluntary contribution fee at <br /> each trailhead in the City's greenspace parks system. <br /> As identified in Figure 3.34, In Order to Help Offset Staffing and <br /> Maintenance Costs of the City's Greenspace System, Please Check the <br /> Following Items That You Think You Could Support?, around 54 percent of <br /> survey respondents indicated that they would like to see a donation box <br /> established using a trailhead kiosk lock box and honor system. <br /> Action FF-1.8. Reevaluate the City's contract with the Lion's Club <br /> regarding the allocation of fees. <br /> Currently,the Lion's Club provides the City approximately$12,000 to <br /> $15,000 a year in fees for exclusive provision of tubing concessions <br /> along the San Marcos River in the City's riverfront parks system. Moving <br /> forward,the City should renegotiate with the Lion's Club to make that <br /> an agreeable percentage of profits so the City/Lion's Club both work <br /> together and they both benefit from years with greater profits. <br /> Action FF-1.9. Consider establishing a fee at each trailhead in the <br /> City's greenspace parks system. <br /> As identified in Figure 3.34, In Order to Help Offset Staffing and <br /> Maintenance Costs of the City's Greenspace System, Please Check the <br /> Following Items That You Think You Could Support?, around 28 percent of <br /> Q respondents would like to charge an entrance fee for non-City residents <br /> and 19 percent of respondents would like to charge an entrance fee <br /> for all visitors.This could include a specified amount for each vehicle in <br /> the parking lot and could or could not include a designated waiver for <br /> residents within the City limits. <br /> Chapter 3 I System Analysis, Needs, and Recommendations 139 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.