My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08142000 Regular Meeting
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
2000 s
>
2000
>
08142000 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2006 11:18:11 AM
Creation date
12/3/2003 10:16:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
City Clerk - Type
Regular Meeting
Date
8/14/2000
Volume Book
141
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> 164. <br /> Regular Meeting August 14,2000 Page 6 <br /> towards a TIP Grant application by San Marcos Consolidated Independent School District, for <br /> replacement computers at the San Marcos Public Library. Mr. Cox moved for approval of the <br /> Grant in the amount $3864.00 and Mr. Moseley seconded the motion. Mr. Mayhew asked ifit <br /> was going to be okay since we have passed the August 8, 2000 deadline. Mr. Gilley stated yes. <br /> Mr. Moseley stated this was good leverage of money and likes the City to participate in this kind <br /> of grant. Ms. Hughson asked if there is any Library Budget money and Mr. Gilley stated no. <br /> The Council then voted unanimously for the approval of the expenditure. <br /> Mayor Chiu introduced a discussion regarding the Downtown Streetscape Improvements Project <br /> and direction to staff. Rodney Cobb, Director of Parks and Recreation introduced Mike Beaty, to <br /> discuss where we are on the project. Mr. Beaty, of Beaty-Saunders Architectural stated the <br /> Streetscape which involves LBJ, Guadalupe, Hopkins, and part of San Antonio street is a <br /> complicated project. The project has been in the design phase for two years with lots of <br /> communication with businesses downtown. The Texas Historic Commission has the design. <br /> Three bids were received and were fifteen percent over the City's funding for project. To reduce <br /> costs, we could delete one of the three street frontages and the reduction would make it easier for <br /> contractors to build faster, which would avoid problems that have occurred in the past. Mr. <br /> Gilley stated the Council has options: to reduce the scope of the project and rebid, or the <br /> Council could choose to increase funds by $350,000. This amount is not enough to justify <br /> issuing bonds. The City could use limited tax notes which are short tenn notes not to exceed <br /> seven years, and this could probably be done locally. Another option would be to issue funds <br /> from reserves and then do a reimbursement agreement when the City goes to bond market again <br /> within eighteen months. Mr. Moseley asked if the reimbursement agreement would affect the <br /> bond ratings and Mr. Gilley stated no. Mr. Moseley asked if the Texas Historic Commission <br /> has funds available and Mr. Beaty stated he did not have expertise to answer that type of <br /> question. Mr. Moseley asked what could assure us we will not be in the same position of the <br /> project time frame running over in Phase I. Mr. Beaty stated we have done a very detailed set <br /> of plans working in front of stores six to eight feet, then filling in with as little down time as <br /> possible, completing in front of the businesses by sequence. Mr. Moseley asked if parking was <br /> going to be a problem. Mr. Beaty stated yes, it will be impacted temporarily. Mr. Cox inquired <br /> which method provides the most savings. Mr. Gilley stated the reimbursement method can be <br /> done by Resolution and the City would have eighteen months to reimburse this expenditure. He <br /> advised that would be the simplest process. Ms. Hughson asked where the funds would come <br /> from and Mr. Gilley stated fund balance. It was consensus to proceed with the Reimbursement <br /> Agreement and explore and seek grant funds. <br /> Mayor Chiu introduced a discussion regarding a presentation by SMCISD regarding the Tax <br /> Ceiling Election to be held on August 26, 2000. Hector Montenegro, Superintendent of <br /> SMCISD introduced Lupe Costilla, Jim Neuhaus, and Kent Morrison. Mr. Montenegro stated <br /> he want to keep people infonned of the Tax Ceiling Election and the consequences if the ballot <br /> proposition fails. He stated ifnot passed, it would probably reduce staff and also eliminate same <br /> school programs between now and December. He stated this would not raise the taxes, but sets <br /> a ceiling on tax to cover growth in the schools. There will be an Infonnation Session for the <br /> public on Tuesday, August 15, 2000 at the Meeting Place and another on August 22, 2000 at the <br /> Activity Center. Ms. Hughson asked is $1.50 is the maximum allowed and Mr. Montenegro <br /> stated yes. Mr. Montenegro stated they are making a plea to keep citizens informed and are not <br /> asking for support. The ability to go to $1.50 will be to take care of growth as it occurs. <br /> Mayor Chiu introduced a discussion regarding training for the City Council on the Policy <br /> Governance Model. Mr. Moseley stated Council needs to come to consensus to move forward <br /> and he would like to see Council follow through. He stated citizens are concerned how the <br /> Council conducts business. Ms. Tatum stated training was very beneficial, and she would like <br /> to see the Council pursue this. Ms. Hughson stated she liked certain parts of the plan but thinks <br /> the citizens expect the Council to be involved at a greater level than the Carver Model. She <br /> thought there were some good points the Council could use, but she does not want to go with the <br /> whole Carver Model Mr. Cox stated he had some reservations, and he talked with the Mayor of <br /> PIano who said they did not discard the plan and stated the Council does not have to go with all <br /> the Carver plan. The Council can adopt what is appropriate for us. Mr. Cox stated he wanted to <br /> move forward and adopt what would work for the Council. Mr. Moseley stated the Carver <br /> Policy said we can adopt what works for the Council. Ms. Hughson stated she liked how they <br /> deal with long range issues. Mr. Gilley stated to continue the program and facilitation, he would <br /> need to schedule a two day workshop with Mike Conduff, and the Council agreed to pursue this. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.