Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Meeting Minutes June 5, 2019 <br />requirement has been recorded in the deeds of record for all single-family <br />subdivisions with the Hays County Clerk's Office. He provided that this <br />should come up with a title search. <br />Stormwater Management and Water Quality: <br />• Revise language for clarity. Applicability of requirement and how impervious <br />surface should be calculated is unclear (6.1.1.1.4) <br />Following discussion there was a consensus of the members of the City Council <br />and Planning and Zoning Commission Members to move forward with staff <br />performing further analysis and bringing it back for consideration. <br />• Credit reduced impervious cover against overall 25% increased area <br />calculation (6.1.1.1.4) <br />Following discussion there was a consensus of the members of the City Council <br />and Planning and Zoning Commission Members to not move forward. <br />• Reduce/limit Watershed Protection Plan requirement(s) for small commercial <br />and multi -family. Offer toolbox of best practice, off the shelf options for <br />meeting water quality and volume standards (2.6.1.1.D) and (6.1.4.1.D) <br />Following discussion there was a consensus of the members of the City Council <br />and Planning and Zoning Commission Members to not move forward. <br />• Add enhanced protections section for re-routed creeks (General -Chapter 6) <br />Previous direction has already been provided related to this topic. Consensus <br />to move forward was provided. <br />• Qualified Watersheds should be administrative and not require Planning and <br />Zoning approval. (2.6.1.1) <br />Following discussion there was a consensus of the members of the City Council <br />and Planning and Zoning Commission Members to move forward with staff <br />performing further analysis and bringing it back for consideration. <br />Parking: <br />• Maintain exemption for projects of 10 or fewer units in CD -5 and CD -5D <br />zones (7.1.2.2.B.1) <br />Following discussion there was a consensus of the members of the City Council <br />and Planning and Zoning Commission Members to move forward with staff <br />performing further analysis and bringing it back for consideration. <br />• Prohibit excessive parking (7.1.1.3) <br />City of San Marcos Page 11 <br />