Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Meeting Minutes June 5, 2019 <br />• Modify definition of RV and manufactured home parks to include tiny <br />homes. Adopt Appendix Q of 2018 building code. (5.1.5.7) and (7.6.1.1) <br />Following discussion there was a consensus of the members of the City Council <br />and Planning and Zoning Commission Members to move forward with staff <br />performing further analysis and bringing it back for consideration. <br />Ms. Mattingly began to review the remaining proposed policy changes to the <br />San Marcos Land Development Code. They are listed below as provided to the <br />membership. <br />Personal Notification: Increase the personal notification area based on the size <br />of the development (2.3.2.1). Following discussion there was a consensus of <br />the members of the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission <br />Members to move forward with considering an increase of the personal <br />notification area based on size and density. <br />Certificate of Appropriateness: Make City Council (not ZBOA) the appellate <br />body for City owned properties (2.5.5.5). Mayor Hughson noted that this has <br />already been completed. <br />Alcohol Conditional Use Permit: No renewal of conditional use permits <br />required after 3 years (2.8.3.5). Mayor Hughson noted that this has already <br />been addressed. <br />Block Perimeter: Add waiver/exception to block perimeter requirement in <br />Heavy Industrial districts (3.6.2.1). Ms. Mattingly explained that this is <br />something that we have seen a lot of on our last few Chapter 380 Economic <br />Development Incentive Agreements. There was a consensus of the members of <br />the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission Members to move <br />forward with staff bringing it back for consideration. <br />Streets: <br />• When Traffic Impact Analysis is required, disallow Level of Service studies in <br />favor of Vehicle Miles Traveled studies (3.5.2.8). Ms. Moyer provided that <br />they understand this request, but are not sure that it would adequately address <br />it. There was a consensus of the members of the City Council and Planning <br />and Zoning Commission Members to move forward with staff performing <br />further analysis and bringing it back for consideration. <br />• Revise street sections to include maximum lane width of IV on all City <br />streets and 10' where 45 mph or less (3.7.2.1). Ms. Moyer explained that they <br />City of San Marcos Page 6 <br />