Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Meeting Minutes April 21, 2020 <br />Kristian Caballero: <br />Dear Members of the San Marcos City Council: <br />On behalf of Texas Appleseed, I would like to express our strong support of <br />the ordinance being considered on the Tuesday, April 21, 2020, City Council <br />Meeting supporting the San Marcos Police Department's Increased Use of <br />Citations in Lieu of Arrest. We urge you to vote for passage of the ordinance <br />in order to maximize public safety, promote equity and reduce racial <br />disparities in the criminal legal system. <br />We also urge you to undo several amendments to the ordinance made on April <br />7th that would significantly weaken its impact. Specifically: <br />• We support reinserting the word "only" into Section 2, so that it reads, <br />• "...SMPD officers may find it necessary to arrest a person suspected of <br />having committed any of the above -listed offenses only if any of the following <br />circumstances are present[.]" <br />• We also support undoing the amendment to the 3rd exception listed in <br />• Section 2, returning to language that reads: "There is reason to believe that <br />the safety of persons (including the subject) would be imminently endangered <br />by the release of the subject. In making this assessment, it shall be considered <br />whether the subject has the physical or mental capacity to endanger the safety <br />of themselves or the public, whether the subject is unlawfully carrying a <br />weapon, and/or if the subject has made immediate threats against other <br />individuals in the area." <br />• We urge you to meaningfully include the community in the future working <br />group sessions by changing Section 6, so that the impacted individuals, <br />advocacy organizations, policy experts and the public have more meaningful <br />input than brief public comment at the beginning of each meaning. Aside from <br />undoing those amendments, we encourage you to reject other last-minute <br />amendments beyond the simple, clean-up amendments that Anita Gupta from <br />the Immigrant Legal Resource Center has suggested for the sake of clarity and <br />precision in the ordinance language. In particular, we oppose any amendments <br />that would narrow the acceptable forms of identification. We commend you <br />for your leadership to reduce unnecessary and harmful arrests in your city, <br />which will be a statewide model for other cities if the ordinance is passed with <br />the original language. In doing so, you would protect San Marcos residents <br />from the harms of arrests and jail stays that serve no public safety purpose, <br />and in turn, make the City of San Marcos safer. A growing body of research <br />demonstrates how devastating arrests and jail time are for low-risk individuals, <br />causing loss of employment, loss of housing, interruption of medical and <br />mental health care, and ultimately increasing their likelihood of re -arrests in <br />the future and decreasing their chances for future financial stability. Your <br />City of San Marcos Page 6 <br />