Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Meeting Minutes April 21, 2020 <br />original ordinance would prevent the "imminent danger" exception from <br />becoming a catch-all that an officer could use to justify arrests whenever they <br />wanted, again undermining the intent of the ordinance to significantly expand <br />the use of citations. <br />We encourage you to reject other last-minute amendments beyond any simple, <br />clean-up amendments. In particular, we oppose any amendments that would <br />narrow the acceptable forms of identification. We have also submitted a letter <br />to City Council expressing our support in greater detail and are happy to <br />answer any questions that Council may have. By passing this ordinance with its <br />original language, this Council would become a leader among Texas cities in <br />protecting its citizens from unnecessary arrests. We urge you to vote for <br />passage of the ordinance in order to maximize public safety, promote equity <br />and reduce racial disparities in San Marcos. Thank you. <br />Ranjana Natarajan: <br />Dear Council Members and Mayor: I am writing to provide comment and <br />legal analysis that I hope will be useful as the San Marcos City Council <br />considers whether to adopt an Ordinance favoring the use of cite -and -release in <br />lieu of arrest—as authorized by Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article <br />14.06 and other provisions of state law—to guide the San Marcos Police <br />Department. <br />For purposes of identification, I am a Clinical Professor at the University of <br />Texas School of Law, where I teach and direct a Civil Rights Clinic. In the <br />Clinic, students represent low-income Texas residents on a variety of civil <br />rights matters, including police misconduct. As such, I am familiar with legal <br />issues involving allegations of police misconduct, false arrest, and related legal <br />defenses such as qualified immunity. <br />I. Ordinances and their Relationship to State Law <br />As you know, ordinances that touch upon areas also regulated by state law are <br />invalid only if they conflict with state law or the Texas Constitution. See Tex. <br />Const. art. XI, Sec. 5(a); City of Laredo v. Laredo Merchants Ass'n, 550 <br />S.W.3d 586, 589, 593 (Tex. 2018) ("local regulation, ancillary to and in <br />harmony with the general scope and purpose of the state enactment, is <br />acceptable") (internal citation omitted). Here, the proposed cite -and -release <br />ordinance does not conflict with state law so long as it does not require law <br />enforcement officers (LSO's) to take any action forbidden by state law or <br />forbid LEO'S from taking action required by state law. <br />II. Policy Advantages of Cite and Release <br />The proposed cite -and -release ordinance has policy advantages. As you know, <br />the Texas Legislature in 2007 amended Article 14.06 of the Texas Code of <br />Criminal Procedure in light of the burdens on county jails around the state, <br />City of San Marcos Page 8 <br />