Laserfiche WebLink
<br />143. <br />Regular Meeting <br /> <br />July 22, 2002 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />camera. Mr. Cobb, Director of Parks and Recreation, stated this recording <br />system will be utilized by the Environmental Health Department and the <br />Parks and Recreation Department to monitor illegal dumping in the City. He <br />also stated this project was funded by a Capital Area Planning Council <br />Solid Waste grant. The Council then voted unanimously for adoption of the <br />Resolution. <br /> <br />Mayor Habingreither introduced for consideration Item 20 removed from the <br />consent agenda, adoption of a Resolution, the caption which was read as <br />follows: <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS, <br />URGING THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE TO SUPPORT LEGISLATION TO REQUIRE <br />THE CONSENT OF LOCAL TAXING ENTITIES FOR TRANSACTIONS BY NONPROFIT <br />CORPORATIONS THAT RESULT IN TAX EXEMPT STATUS FOR RENTAL HOUSING <br />PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Mr. Mihalkanin moved for adoption of the Resolution, and Ms. Narvaiz <br />seconded the motion. Mr. Mayhew stated Mark Taylor, City Attorney, has <br />done some research on the Jefferson Common Apartment Complex sale. He <br />stated the research showed the property was purchased for $9.5 million by a <br />nonprofit corporation, which resulted in a tax-exempt status for rental <br />housing property and removal from the tax roll. Mr. Mayhew stated the <br />removal of the apartment complex resulted in an annual revenues loss of <br />$44,640.39. Jim Green stated he followed the Bobcat Village transaction <br />and removal from the tax roll for 2 years. He stated he made several calls <br />and found out until the Legislature changes the law, there is nothing from <br />stopping these removals. Mr. Mihalkanin stated he would like a letter sent <br />to these nonprofit corporations asking them to cease the removal from tax <br />rolls. Mr. Green encouraged the Council to adopt the Resolution and thinks <br />the County and School should pass a similar Resolution. The Council then <br />voted unanimously for adoption of the Resolution. <br /> <br />Mayor Habingreither introduced for consideration Item 22 removed from the <br />consent agenda, adoption of a Resolution, the caption which was read as <br />follows: <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS, <br />AWARDING AN ANNUAL CONTRACT TO U.S. FILTER FOR MISCELLANEOUS <br />WATER/WASTEWATER REPAIR PARTS; AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASING MANAGER TO <br />EXECUTE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY; AND DECLARING AN <br />EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Mr. Taylor moved for adoption of the Resolution, and Ms. Tatum seconded the <br />motion. Mr. Mark Taylor stated the estimated amount in Part 1 of the <br />Resolution should be $72,451.73. Mr. Taylor moved for the amendment of <br />Part 1... estima ted amount of $72,451.73 is approved, and Mr. Mihalkanin <br />seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. The Council then voted <br />unanimously for adoption of the Resolution. <br />