Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Meeting Minutes June 16, 2020 <br />This is the leadership of a city manager who thinks he is the Emperor of San <br />Marcos and the elected officials we voted in are not holding him accountable. <br />Bert's own employee who filled out a survey he wanted a one-sided street <br />sidewalk, and earned months of overtime making one in my yard, but refuses <br />to have an ADA compliant one in his yard. In your packet tonight there is a <br />robust discussion of the Habitat for Humanity policies. I've sent you the screen <br />capture Section 5.2 Legal Issues and it discusses ADA requirements. That is a <br />private sidewalk in front of that street sweepers house. His new urbanism house <br />and his private sidewalk was the SOLE reason for the butchery of our yards/ <br />And, you are breaking the ADA, that is not an ADA sidewalk. His neighbor <br />Angela will have her Huge Live Oak butchered and mean while his yard is <br />unscathed. Not only is the ADA in violation but it is a liability for both the city <br />and the land owner, a city worker. So, to the Letter to the Editor writer, we <br />have a city manager and elected officials that treat voters different. Finally, the <br />spike in the number of cases of COVIDI9 is due to the lack of face coverings. <br />According to the article "Study: 100% face mask use could crush second, third <br />COVID-19 wave" published June 12, 2020 it states that "As has been <br />well-publicized, wearing a mask primarily protects others from yourself, rather <br />than the other way around. It is not a sign that you consider others a danger." <br />To that effect since the article says even "Homemade coverings that catch only <br />50 percent of exhaled droplets would provide a "population -level benefit." <br />Thank you for your time and God Bless San Marcos. <br />Linda Coker: <br />I understand that the agenda item for Cape's Dam was pulled and will <br />addressed at a meeting later this week, but I still feel compelled to use this <br />time. I honestly do not understand why this is still an issue. There is no money <br />to remove it. There are no permits to remove it. But there is a group of people <br />wanting to do what would be a boon to our community. How in the world <br />could a bigger park, with a repaired dam be a bad thing? The East side <br />deserves it as does the rest of the community. There are numerous arguments <br />about the science and the historical aspects. I am going to save making <br />comments on that for the next meeting. But I am pleading, please stop and <br />look at the big picture. Remove ego's and biases and see that working with the <br />County on this project would be a feather in our cap. Believe me, when you are <br />there and seeing the beauty you help create, the fun families will be having that <br />you brought about and the preservation of San Marcos' story, good and bad, <br />that you helped tell; you will know that the right decision has finally been <br />made. I am truly asking, from the bottom of my heart. Let us make a decision <br />and move on. It is time. <br />CONSENT AGENDA <br />City of San Marcos Page 4 <br />