Laserfiche WebLink
SAN MARCOS TRANSIT PLAN I FINALREPORT <br />City of San Marcos <br />Ridership impacts of COVID-19. <br />The City of San Marcos reduced operating hours and frequencies of fixed -route and p aratransit <br />service for a four-month period in response to the initial COVID-19 outbreak. Fares were also <br />eliminated duringthis period and the system remains fare -free during the development of this <br />report. Social distancing measures were implemented on buses and at San Marcos Station, <br />including limiting the number of available seats and requiring face coverings. Texas State <br />University also adjusted operating hours, reduced frequencies, andlimited seating on Bobcat <br />Shuttle routes. CARTS continued regular service on interurban Route 1510 (Austin -San Marcos) <br />but suspended service on interurban Route 1517 (Austin -Texas State University) for a 4 -month <br />period. Due to changes in employment, enrollment, activity, and attitudes it is unclear if transit <br />demand and ridership will return to levels priorto COVID-19. <br />Infrequent local service. <br />Municipalbus service in San Marcos has historically been scarce in terms of frequency, hours of <br />operation, and days of service. Priorto 2015, San MarcosTransit consisted often routes providing <br />hourly service. In January 2015, the system was restructured based on recommendations from <br />the previoustransit plan. Several routes were consolidated, and 30 -minute service was introduced <br />on two of five routes, or approximately55% of bus stops in the city. <br />Limited street connectivity and pedestrian barriers. <br />The City of San Marcos has nineteen at -grade Union Pacific Railroad crossingsthat impact transit <br />schedule reliability. Interstate 35 and its parallel frontage roads span the entire 12.5 -mile length <br />of the citywith only ten overpasses and underpasses. The Union PacificRailroad and I-35 system <br />along withhigh-speed state highways, farm -to -market roads, and ranch roads create significant <br />barriers to transit. Gaps in the sidewalkandbike network further limit accessto transit. <br />An isolated transit hub. <br />San Marcos Station is the primary transfer p oint for San Marcos Transit, CARTS regional service, <br />Greyhound, andAmtrak. The station locationis situated approximately 1/2 -mile south of <br />Downtown San Marcos between twotracks and adjacent to a one-wayroad,resultingin out -of - <br />direction travel, frequenttrain delays, and impactsto speed andreliability. <br />Divergent transit services. <br />San Marcos Transitbus service is currently designed to provide San Marcos residentswith access <br />to a variety of destinations across the city on weekdays only. Service levels and ridership are low <br />in comparison with peer cities. Complementary p aratransit service connects individuals not able <br />to ride the bus with pre -scheduled point-to-point transportation. <br />Bob cat Shuttle is designed to transport students between university housing or private <br />apartments and several points on campus. Service levels and availability are tied to the university <br />academic calendar. Connectivity between San Marcos Transit and Bobcat Shuttle routes is limited <br />to a few on -street locations. <br />Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc. 11-3 <br />