My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09.15.20 Work Session
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
2020's
>
2020
>
09.15.20 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2020 12:47:33 PM
Creation date
10/30/2020 12:46:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
Date
9/15/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes September 15, 2020 <br />is a reportable lobbying activity. The consensus is to ensure the staff member <br />files the report. If a council member discusses the issue outside of a committee <br />meeting, that would be the individual council member's responsibility to <br />report. <br />Council Member Baker inquired if a lobbyist must disclose the organizations <br />of which they are a member. Mr. Lollar responded that a lobbyist would have <br />to disclose the organization or whose behalf they are lobbying. Mr. Cosentino <br />noted that this is covered in the Registration Required section (1) d. which <br />states "Any person, other than the client, who is known by the lobbyist to <br />contribute financially to the compensation of the lobbyist, or which, in whole <br />or in major part, plans, super"vises, or controls the lobbyist's lobbying <br />activities on behalf of the client." <br />Deputy Mayor Pro Tem Rockeymoore noted that during his tenure on the <br />Ethics Review Commission, he worked on this proposal. He inquired about <br />how this ordinance compares to ordinances in other cities nearby. Mr. Lollar <br />noted the committee looked at ordinances in Austin and San Antonio to start. <br />They also looked at New Braunfels and Kyle. Those were not as specific. They <br />were concerned about more and more student housing and decided to use text <br />from the larger cities since San Marcos is growing. He noted that we need this <br />ordinance. <br />Mayor Hughson asked the following questions, what is the point of the <br />ordinance? Is it more for employees or elected officials? What is the problem <br />they are trying to solve? Mr. Lollar stated people are often worried about how <br />the developments and new businesses are being approved. We are trying to <br />prioritize transparency to ensure we have the trust of constituents. Mr. Lollar <br />stated when accusation of mistrust are made, that reporting will be available <br />and the city will be in a state to show who we are dealing with. Ms. Walden <br />stated when complaints come in, the city is protected and the lobbyists are <br />responsible for the paperwork. He noted that there have been four ethics <br />complaints in 2020 so far. <br />Mayor Hughson read the definition of Municipal Question which states: <br />"Municipal question means a public policy issue of a discretionary nature <br />pending or impending before City Council or any board or commission, <br />including, but not limited to, proposed action, or proposals for action, in the <br />form of ordinances, resolutions, motions, recommendations, reports, <br />regulations, policies, nominations, appointments, sanctions, and bids, <br />City of San Marcos page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.