My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 2021-064/approving Substantial Amendment No. 10 to the Community Development Block Grant-Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) Action Plan
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
2020's
>
2021
>
Res 2021-064/approving Substantial Amendment No. 10 to the Community Development Block Grant-Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) Action Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2021 3:25:55 PM
Creation date
4/29/2021 1:51:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Approving
Number
2021-64
Date
4/20/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
559
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
"sleeds Assess IIIOfiieIIIff"U;;; <br />HUD requires that the Needs Assessment evaluate the three core aspects of recovery — housing (interim <br />and permanent, owner, rental, single-family and multi -family, affordable and market rate), <br />infrastructure, and the economy (e.g., estimated job losses or tax revenue loss due to the disaster). By <br />understanding where its critical needs lie, the City will be able to more effectively allocate the funds as <br />needed and described further on in this Action Plan. The City recognizes that there is still data missing <br />from these calculations and therefore cautions that this is an estimate of need, not a statement of fact. <br />Information regarding NFIP payout amounts, FEMA Public Assistance payment amounts, unidentified <br />disaster impacted projects, and more will be continually coming in and will need to be reviewed and <br />incorporated into future revisions of this Needs Assessment and Action Plan. Finally, the City also wants <br />to note that the current allocation is $25,080,000, which is not anticipated to be enough to cover the <br />needs outlined below. Therefore, the City will need to seek additional ways to leverage these funds and <br />extend the use of this very limited resource. <br />A. Housing <br />a) Baseline Information and Data <br />The City, home to Texas State University (enrollment approximately 39,979) and a frequent tourist <br />destination, has a very young demographic. Data from the American Community Survey (ACS) Data 2010 <br />— 2014 shows that over 42.4% of the population falls in the 18-24 age cohort, with another 24.3% of the <br />population in the 25-44 bracket, while only 6.7% are older than age 65. This young population, and the <br />transient nature of students, lends the housing environment in the City to heavily lean towards rental <br />housing rather than home ownership. <br />As of 2014, there were 18,782 occupied housing units within the City, with 72.8% of all housing units <br />being rentals and only 27.2% of the housing units being owner occupied (ACS Data 2010 — 2014). Based <br />on the total occupied households from all income brackets including both renter and owner -occupied <br />units: Less than 1% live in substandard housing without complete plumbing and/or complete kitchens. <br />• 1.3% are considered to be "severely overcrowded" with more than 1.51 persons per room. <br />• 2.3% are considered to be "overcrowded" with 1.01 to 1.5 persons per room. <br />• 36.6% of homeowners (1,121 households) expend over 30% of their monthly income on housing <br />costs. <br />• 75.1% of renters (9,660 households) expend over 30% of their monthly income on rent. <br />HUD considers any family that expends more than 30% of their monthly income on housing to have a <br />housing cost burden. This is just one of the serious housing problems that HUD looks for in a community. <br />Others include the presence of a disability in the household, substandard or unsafe housing and <br />overcrowding. Of all of these, the primary statistically significant serious problem in the City is the <br />existence of a high cost burden on families, especially for those who rent. Additionally, 33% of housing <br />units are more than 35 years old - this imparts maintenance costs that can be prohibitive for low income <br />households. <br />There are 5,630 non -family households in The City that have a cost burden that exceeds 30% of their <br />monthly income and 3,925 non -family households with a cost burden exceeding 50% of their monthly <br />income. The majority of these are renters. By contrast, there are only 30 non -family households who live <br />in overcrowded (more than 1/per room) conditions. The 2010-14 ACS indicates that 32.8% of the <br />Last Updated 3/03/20 Page 13 of 63 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.