My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 2021-064/approving Substantial Amendment No. 10 to the Community Development Block Grant-Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) Action Plan
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
2020's
>
2021
>
Res 2021-064/approving Substantial Amendment No. 10 to the Community Development Block Grant-Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) Action Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2021 3:25:55 PM
Creation date
4/29/2021 1:51:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Approving
Number
2021-64
Date
4/20/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
559
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Response <br />The City plans to design its housing program(s) in a way that creates long term resiliency against flooding. Comment appreciated and duly noted. No change to Action Plan necessary at <br /> this time.The City is exploring a number of options for creating better and more sustainable infrastructure, reducing repetitive loss and flooding within the City of San Marcos, and <br /> assisting those with outstanding unmet housing needs. We appreciate and will consider your comments.Comment appreciated and duly noted. No change to Action Plan necessary at this time.The <br /> City is exploring a number of options for creating better and more sustainable infrastructure, reducing repetitive loss and flooding within the City of San Marcos, and assisting those <br /> with outstanding unmet housing needs. We appreciate and will consider your comments.Comment appreciated and duly noted. No change to Action Plan necessary at this time. <br />Comment <br />Did you experience flood damage?Did you experience flood damage?Did you experience flood damage? <br />I feel that money should be used in lift-upI am strongly against the proposal to divert <br />Having lived in San Marcos since 1981, <br />YesYes <br />No <br />Form Question:Answer:Comment:our house.Form Question:Answer:Comment:Blanco flood waters. I pay outrages school taxes to SMISD so I should have a voice. I live in Guadalupe County on <br /> the San Marcos river. We also received flood damage. How can you even consider putting my neighbors and I in more danger by diverting the water into our neighborhoods. I have my doubts <br /> regarding your engineers, look how well the Woods project turned out. I am apalled that you think my life and property are not as important as the people living in SanMarcos. A possible <br /> better solution is to construct a resovior in less populated area on the upper Blanco river.If San Marcos ISD does not tax me out of my home I guess you will try to flood me out.Form <br /> Question:Answer:Comment:having recently built a new home on the SM River, and having keptclose eye on San Marcos river and city politics over the years, I submit this comment about <br /> the proposed bypass plan being considered by SM leaders using HUD funding. Several years ago the SM leaders at that time approved the development of a massive apartment t complex on <br /> the SM River, despite significant scientific evidence that such structure would create severe flooding problems for <br />Element <br />Elevation <br />Source <br />Date <br /># <br />119/1/16Online FormHousing-129/2/16Online FormInfrastructure139/2/16Online FormInfrastructure <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.