My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 2022-055R/Arts Master Plan approval
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
2020's
>
2022
>
Res 2022-055R/Arts Master Plan approval
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2022 1:15:27 PM
Creation date
3/23/2022 1:15:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Approving
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
10 <br />PAGE <br />, <br />3 <br /> <br />foster <br />to <br />SECTION <br /> <br />hoto: City of San Marcos <br />P <br />having the City <br />processes needed <br />Amy Hall and Jessica Botello <br /> <br />By <br />” by <br />application and approval <br />, the <br />go through four approvals <br /> <br /> <br />will be faster while still earning the <br /> <br />must <br />All public art policies from other <br />about funding mechanisms helps <br />The Crockett Mural <br />“ <br />currently <br /> <br />transparency <br />public art <br /> <br />, two of which are with City Council. <br />treamline public art approval process <br />SRequire only one application process for each pieceConsider adding details about how the City is funding public art <br />provide just the final approval <br />current policy states that an artwork representative must go <br /> <br />3. 4. 5. <br />--- <br />5 PermanentprocessesCouncil process for new public artworksapproval of all overseeing entities.5 Thethrough the application process twice if they have a concept in mind for which site <br /> approval is requested. Consider requiring only one application where the piece is conditional to the location reduce the number of applications and approvalto further streamline the <br /> art in public places process.5 Openness and community and collaboration. cities that Keen Independent reviewed for this project include details about public art funding. <br />For a <br /> <br />to <br /> <br />2022 <br />N <br />tive of the <br /> <br />representa <br />serve a specific community, or if the <br /> <br />Keen Independent with providing <br />and additional public notice <br />at least one <br />SAN MARCOS ARTS MASTER PLA <br />ed <br />— <br />in and representation. <br />- <br />is on the San Marcos Art in Public Places Policy, see <br /> <br />. <br />G <br />For each permanent art request, the Arts Commission should consider forming a subcommittee that includes a resident representative from the affected neighborhood or area in which the <br /> art would be placed.Consider a community review process for select artworks <br /> <br />Update the Art in Public Places Policy <br />1. 2. <br />. <br />-- <br />5 The City of San Marcos taskrecommendations for revising the Art in Public Places Policy. deeper analysAppendix 5 Having an option to include community in which the artwork is placed <br /> may help ensure that the artwork accurately reflects the culture of the community that it would be serving.5 For artwork that is intended to proposed location is within a designated <br /> district, consider including a community review process increase local buy KEEN INDEPENDENT RESEARCH <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.