My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 2022-055R/Arts Master Plan approval
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
2020's
>
2022
>
Res 2022-055R/Arts Master Plan approval
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2022 1:15:27 PM
Creation date
3/23/2022 1:15:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Approving
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Improving infrastructure, e.g., buildings, parking. <br /> “A visually pleasing downtown is something I would like to see.” <br /> Maximizing what already exists in the community. <br />I. Recommendations for the City’s Investment of Time, Energy and Funding <br />Keen Independent asked interviewees where the City should invest its time, energy and funding to improve <br />arts and culture. <br />General insights. A few interviewees provided general comments regarding the City’s approach to <br />improving arts and culture in San Marcos. <br /> There should be a focus on “making things better than just okay.” <br />“There are correct ways to do things and then there is the beautiful way.” <br /> Implementing the master plan when it’s done. <br /> \[City representative\] doesn’t feel the City should be the one doing that. Feels private <br />institutions would do a better job. <br />Funding, grants and other City resources.Many Interviewees expressed a need for more financial <br />resources. <br /> More funding would be helpful. Bigger commitment to funding to help expand the offerings. <br />The City could do more to advertise and promote. <br /> We can’t get donations from the White community. We need additional funds. <br /> A dedicated budget for the arts would help us get the word out about our events and other <br />cultural events. <br /> Upping the budget overall. <br /> There are a lot of cities who have a strong arts presence because they have a tax percentage <br />that goes into a public art fund to invest in quality public art and pay artists well for it. One <br />percent for new construction tax would help make it a priority. <br /> The chamber might be a great partner. Having the funds available. Maybe having a <br />presentation to how they can take advantage of placemaking. <br /> Grant programs that incentivize things that are hard to find, like collaboration. A grant <br />where collaborators are required. <br /> What the City is doing for arts and culture now needs to be reimagined. Our \[City\] budget <br />hasn’t kept up. <br /> Incentives are needed to open up new spaces. <br /> If the City had an effective person to work with grants. Would prefer to see that go to <br />individuals and business to put up murals. <br /> Utilizing other funding sources, like they do in other cities in Texas. Looking at other <br />communities and how much they take from HOT tax. San Marcos has great architecture, <br />promoting heritage through architecture and the architects. <br /> City should have a friendly process for creative businesses to get started, rather than <br />expecting new business owners to learn the ropes on their own. City should then have a <br />mentoring program to guide new businesses so that they do not go under so quickly. <br />KEEN INDEPENDENT RESEARCH — SAN MARCOS ARTS MASTER PLAN 2022 APPENDIX E,PAGE 16 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.