My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01.04.22 Regular Meeting
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
2020's
>
2022
>
01.04.22 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2023 1:59:50 PM
Creation date
4/1/2022 3:47:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Meeting Minutes January 4, 2022 <br />Mayor Hughson stated if amending the ordinance would like to add a deadline <br />of two weeks prior to a meeting and identify who the items are sent. She <br />suggested to email city manager and assistant city managers and city <br />manager's office staff, city clerk and city attorney and unless three people have <br />already discussed it also to send the Mayor. <br />Council Member Baker stated Mayor's suggestions are reasonable. He stated <br />that all topics requested should go to the council and not to a committee. He <br />would like to include background information on discussion items and would <br />like to see a Powerpoint or staff notes of phone calls and attach relevant emails <br />related to the agenda item. <br />Mayor Hughson noted that the only time a request item was referred to a <br />committee is when the requestor was asked if that would be OK, noting that <br />one of the council committees might be working on a similar topic. If the <br />request was to go directly to a council meeting agenda, that is what was done. <br />Council Member Baker expressed concern that if the requester is not on the <br />committee, but emails the committee, then there would be four council <br />members conferring on the topic which can violate Texas Open Meetings Act <br />(TOMA). Mayor Hughson <br />stated she would never want to violate TDMA. Mayor Hughson asked Mr. <br />Cosentino if two council to members have a topic and they reach out to a <br />council committee member now more council members have discussed. <br />Mr. Cosentino stated depending on how much verbal exchange was taken it <br />might. If it were just an email stating the request it might be permissible but <br />the potential violation can be present. Mayor Hughson noted that when a <br />request is made, it goes on the rolling agenda, and then a decision is made as <br />to which agenda to place it. She doesn't feel she has ever removed a request <br />from an agenda, but sometimes a request is placed on a later agenda than the <br />council member wanted. She has asked requesters if a delay would be OK and <br />the requester agreed. She has had several items she waited for several meetings <br />to place on a shorter agenda. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Scott noted that a request to push an item to a future agenda <br />is reasonable and he has been fine with that in the past. <br />Mr. Cosentino explained Section 2.044, stating the deadline for two council <br />members to make a request to place a discussion item on an agenda before the <br />mayor sets the agenda for the meeting. He observed during the years the <br />City of San Marcos Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.