My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03.01.22 Work Session
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
2020's
>
2022
>
03.01.22 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2022 11:01:20 PM
Creation date
4/1/2022 4:02:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Meeting Minutes March 1, 2022 <br />The living wage was replaced by the county all industry average wage for the <br />county in which a business is or is going to be located. Those amounts are <br />$43,394 for Mays County, $38,338 for Caldwell County, and $45,886 for <br />Guadalupe County. <br />The EDSM Board had multiple meetings to discuss proposed updates to the <br />policy. There was a lot of great discussion looking at items from a number of <br />points -of -view. The recommendation resolution included in the packet was <br />passed 6-3 at the January 28 meeting. There are details in as to comments why <br />certain board members mentioned they voted for or against it, but the primary <br />concern that was shared involved removing or keeping the M&O limitation on <br />the tax rate. The final version that was passed by the EDSM Board does <br />recommend keeping the total tax rate on the table and not limiting it in the <br />policy to only the M&O portion. The proposed version staff is bringing to you <br />today does include that limitation. <br />The proposal brought by staff removes what was Exhibits A & B which had the <br />preferred scenario map and the strategic initiatives. Initially, staff thought to <br />include those documents within the policy for easy reference by any applicants; <br />however, because both of those documents can change or be updated by City <br />Council separately, it was recommended to not have them embedded within <br />the policy but to ensure that they are on the city's incentive page so they can <br />still be referenced easily but not require the policy to be updated every time <br />there is a tweak to one of those documents. <br />Then the last two changes came about as staff continued to work on what the <br />processes and incentives would look like. There is some enhanced wording on <br />the processes the grants would follow along with updated wording for the <br />Downtown Co -Marketing Fund. <br />Discussion was held on the proposed policy change related to the potential to <br />limit tax -based incentives to only the M&O portion of the tax rate. The current <br />total tax rate is 0.6030 per $100 valuation. The Maintenance and Operations <br />portion, the part that is used in the General Fund for normal city operations, is <br />currently 0.4076 (or 67.6%) of the tax rate, and the Interest & Sinking portion, <br />the part that is used to service the debt of the City, is currently 0.1954 (or <br />32.4%) of the tax rate. If there is a project with a $10 million capital <br />investment and those improvements are appraised at that same amount, the <br />M&O portion of the taxes to the City would be $40,760 and the I&S portion <br />would be $19,540, for a total of $60,300 rebated to the business if a 100% <br />incentive is given. With the current policy, if an incentive is offered from the <br />City of San Marcos Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.