Laserfiche WebLink
Transition of Zoning Types Much of the abutting developed neighborhood is already <br />zoned R-1, and another undeveloped tract adjacent to this <br />subdivision is zoned R-2 for reasons similar to this request. <br />Therefore, the proposed rezoning will not have a <br />substantive effect on the zoning pattern, and the change <br />will actually provide for dwelling unit densities that are <br />more consistent with the existing residential land use <br />intensity of the area. Although the requested R-2 zoning is <br />classified as a medium density district because of its <br />smaller lot size requirements, the actual density of these <br />lots as platted will be well within the 6 d.u./acre limitation <br />of the Low Density Residential land use designation. <br />Changed Conditions The PUD was planned to be developed as "zero lot -line" or <br />.patio" homes on narrow lots whereby one wall of each <br />detached dwelling would be located on a side lot line, with <br />a larger side yard occupied by a patio on the opposite side. <br />Construction ceased after five of the homes were built, <br />apparently due to the economy and to the financial status of <br />the developer. Most of the original subdivision is being <br />sold to a new owner who believes that more conventional <br />single-family dwellings on larger lots would be more <br />marketable at this time. <br />Adequacy of Infrastructure The streets and utilities are already in place and are <br />certainly adequate considering that the number of dwelling <br />units is being reduced to virtually half of the original plan. <br />Potential Impacts Because the density is being reduced through the replatting <br />of the subdivision, any potential negative impacts that <br />might have resulted from development under the PUD plan <br />would also be reduced as a result of this proposal. <br />Precedent(s) The R-2 district has been used in similar circumstances in <br />other locations in the city where conditions beyond the <br />property owner's control resulted in lot dimensions that do <br />not comply with the minimum requirements of the R-1 <br />district, even though the lot is still large enough to result in <br />a gross density calculation within the low density range. <br />Consistency With Master Plan No inconsistencies with the policies of the Master Plan. <br />Although the R-2 district was originally intended for <br />smaller single-family lots that require a medium density <br />land use designation, the actual platting of larger lots <br />ensures compliance with the low density designation. <br />Alternative Designation(s) None. <br />Response to Notification None. <br />Staff Recommendation Approval. <br />