My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 2021-246 approving a Development Agreement with HK Baugh Ranch, LLC, HK Riley’s Pointe, LLC, and Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC, to regulate the annexation and future development of approximately 1,142 acres of land
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
2020's
>
2021
>
Res 2021-246 approving a Development Agreement with HK Baugh Ranch, LLC, HK Riley’s Pointe, LLC, and Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC, to regulate the annexation and future development of approximately 1,142 acres of land
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2024 3:58:33 PM
Creation date
9/10/2024 3:40:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Approving
Number
2021-246
Date
12/7/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
714
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURES <br /> D. Determination of Intensity 1. Whether the proposed zoning map amendment <br /> implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive <br /> 1. For the purpose of determining a less intense zoning Plan and preferred scenario map; <br /> classification under subsections B.3 and C.2,the following <br /> Table 2.3 shall determine intensity of zoning districts in 2. Whether the proposed zoning map amendment <br /> the order listed with Character District 1 (CD-1) being the is consistent with any adopted small area plan or <br /> least intense and Heavy Industrial (HI) being the most neighborhood character study for the area; <br /> intense. Future Development(FD) is a default zoning <br /> classification available only upon annexation and may not 3. Whether the proposed zoning map amendment <br /> be recommended or approved as a less intense zoning implements the policies of any applicable plan adopted by <br /> district in connection with an initial request for a more City Council; <br /> intense zonign district classification. 4. Whether the proposed zoning map amendment is <br /> 400412.3 fhtdrttiIQN C+; _�lSt.I°x consistent with any applicable development agreement in <br /> Character District 1 CD-1 effect; <br /> Character District 2 CD-2 5. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change in <br /> Single Family Rural SF-R zoning district classification and the standards applicable <br /> Single Family 6 SF-6 to such uses shall be appropriate in the immediate area of <br /> Single Family 4.5 SF-4.5 the land to be reclassified; <br /> Character District 2.5 CD-2.5 6. Whether the proposed zoning will reinforce the existing or <br /> Manufactured Home MH planned character of the area; <br /> Neighborhood Density 3 ND-3 <br /> Character District 3 CD-3 7• Whether the site is appropriate for the development <br /> Neighborhood Density 3.2 ND-3.2 allowed in the proposed district; <br /> Neighborhood Density3.5 ND-3.5 $• Whether there are substantial reasons why the property <br /> Neighborhood Density 4 ND-4 cannot be used according to the existing zoning; <br /> Character District 4 CH-4 9. Whether there is a need for the proposed use at the <br /> Neighborhood Commercial N-CM proposed location; <br /> Character District 5 CD-5 10. Whether the City and other service providers will be able <br /> Character District 5 Downtown CD-5D to provide sufficient public facilities and services including <br /> Employment Center EC schools, roads, recreation facilities,wastewater treatment, <br /> Heavy Commercial HC water supply and stormwater facilities, public safety, and <br /> Light Industrial LI emergency services,while maintaining sufficient levels of <br /> Heavy Industrial HI service to existing development; <br /> (Ord. No. 2020-60, 9-1-2020) 11. Whether the proposed rezoning will have a significant <br /> adverse impact on property in the vicinity of the subject <br /> Section 2.5.1.4Criteria for Approval property; <br /> A. In making a determination regarding a requested zoning 12. For requests to a Neighborhood Density District,whether <br /> change,the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City the proposed amendment complies with the compatibility <br /> Council may consider the following factors: of uses and density in Section 4.1.2.5. <br /> 2:30 Amended: September 1, 2020 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.