My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 2021-246 approving a Development Agreement with HK Baugh Ranch, LLC, HK Riley’s Pointe, LLC, and Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC, to regulate the annexation and future development of approximately 1,142 acres of land
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
2020's
>
2021
>
Res 2021-246 approving a Development Agreement with HK Baugh Ranch, LLC, HK Riley’s Pointe, LLC, and Benchmark Acquisitions, LLC, to regulate the annexation and future development of approximately 1,142 acres of land
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2024 3:58:33 PM
Creation date
9/10/2024 3:40:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Approving
Number
2021-246
Date
12/7/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
714
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURES <br /> DIVISION 2: SEQUENCE OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS ARTICLE 2: AUTHORITY OF DECISION MAKERS <br /> Section 2.1.2.1 General Rules for Priority <br /> DIVISION 1: GENERAL PROVISIONS <br /> Where more than one development application is required by this <br /> development code in order to initiate or continue development of Section 2.2.1.1 Source of Authority <br /> land,the requests or applications shall be decided in the following <br /> Authority under this development code shall be vested in and <br /> general sequence: <br /> delegated to the officials and decision-makers designated in this <br /> A. Applications classified as legislative shall be first decided and Chapter 2,Article 2 and under the city's charter,the constitution <br /> determined prior to all other applications. and laws of the State of Texas and the city code.This authority shall <br /> be deemed supplemental to any other authority lawfully conferred <br /> B. Applications classified as quasi-judicial shall be decided prior upon the officials and decision-makers.The omission of a citation in <br /> to applications classified as administrative. this development code to any authority conferred upon the officials <br /> C. Applications within a class which are assigned priority under and decision-makers under the city's charter,the constitution or <br /> this Development Code shall be decided prior to subordinate laws of the State of Texas or the city code shall not be construed as <br /> applications. limiting the actions of such officials and decision-makers taken in <br /> accordance with and in reliance upon such authority. <br /> Section 2.1.2.2Specific Rules of Priority Section 2.2.1.2implied Authority <br /> A. Applications of Mixed Classification.A property owner <br /> The officials and decision-makers shall have all implied authority <br /> may submit development applications of different priority <br /> c necessary to carry out the duties and responsibilities expressly <br /> classifications simultaneously unless otherwise written in this <br /> d delegated by this development code to the extent the implied <br /> development code.Action on accompanying applications shall <br /> authority is not in conflict with the expressly delegated authority. <br /> be as follows: <br /> 1. Denial of a legislative application shall be deemed a Section 2.2.1.31-imitation on Authority <br /> denial of any pending quasi-judicial or administrative A. City Policy. It is the policy of the city that the standards and <br /> applications,or subordinate applications for the same procedures applicable to development of property within <br /> land,on the date the legislative application is denied. the city limits and within the city's extraterritorial jurisdiction <br /> 2. Denial of a quasi-judicial application shall be deemed a are as stated in this development code, notwithstanding any <br /> denial of any pending administrative or subordinate quasi- representation by any city official summarizing, paraphrasing or <br /> judicial applications for the same land on the date the otherwise interpreting such standards to the contrary,whether <br /> quasi-judicial application is denied. generally or as applied to development of specific property. <br /> 3. Subordinate applications shall not be approved subject to B. Representations Concerning Future Action on Application. <br /> approval of priority applications. No city official,whether an employee of the city or a member <br /> of an appointed board or commission,or a member of the <br /> 4. Any subordinate application that must be decided within a governing body of the city, shall have the authority to make <br /> time certain under this development code and that is not representations to a property owner concerning the likelihood <br /> accompanied by an express waiver of such time limitation of an outcome of that official's decision or the decision of an <br /> pending decision on the priority application shall be appointed board or commission or the city council, on any <br /> deemed incomplete and shall not be further processed. development application that has yet to be filed or is pending <br /> before the city for decision. An official may, however, upon <br /> B. Subordinate Applications.Approval of any subordinate request of a person, convey information concerning that <br /> application shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of official's position on a pending application in accordance <br /> approval of all priority applications. with procedures established in this Chapter 2. No person is <br /> Amended:September 1.,2020 2:5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.