My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 2025-140 adopting the Community Development Block Grant (“CDBG”) 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
2020's
>
2025
>
Res 2025-140 adopting the Community Development Block Grant (“CDBG”) 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2025 9:42:04 AM
Creation date
8/13/2025 4:28:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Adopting
Number
2025-140
Date
8/5/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
182
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of San Marcos Five Year Consolidated Plan for the 2025-2029 Program Years— FINAL—Last Updated 08/08/25 <br /> 2025. Paper copies of the survey were available at the City Library and City Hall. A link to the survey was provided to City staff in an <br /> organization wide newsletter, and it was sent to all followers of the City's Consolidated Plan and Dream Sessions web pages. <br /> Seventy-two people attended the public workshops and 89 responded to the survey. The four top priority needs stated in the survey <br /> responses were in the public services category, with 55% of respondents ranking disability/elder services, youth programs, services <br /> for abuse survivors, and homelessness prevention as a high priority. Regarding the other categories that were ranked as high priority <br /> by respondents, 42% considered transportation to be a high priority, followed by economic development at 37%, and public facilities <br /> at 35%. In the comments, the most needed public services cited were for LGBTQIA+ support (5 comments) and extending the current <br /> support for the agencies that apply for CDBG funding (5 comments). The survey comments discussed transitional housing (2 <br /> comments), housing affordability (1 comment) and rental unit inspections (1 comment). Infrastructure comments revolved around <br /> public transportation (3 comments), and recreation (5 comments). <br /> The survey drilled into more detail on housing issues and asked about fair housing practices. 72% considered the inability for low- <br /> income families to maintain their homes to be a high priority, followed by 71% who considered housing costs too high for income. <br /> The next highest issue was inadequate supply of houses for sale at an affordable price, at 64%. Affordable housing comments revolved <br /> around the high rent and property values (8 comments) and multiple properties owned by individuals, reducing housing stock (6 <br /> comments). Regarding fair housing issues, 36% of respondents think that people do not understand fair housing rights, and 34% cited <br /> a lack of renter/landlord mediation services. <br /> During the workshops, staff presented the process for creation of the Consolidated Plan, Citizen Participation Plan and Action Plan, <br /> along with information on various CDBG eligible categories. Residents were asked to prioritize the categories and share their simulated <br /> budgets featuring the activities they would fund. Residents chatted in depth with staff regarding the impact of CDBG during the past <br /> five years and the areas in town that could benefit most from future public improvements. During the workshop at the senior center, <br /> the attendees asked to consider more senior services and facilitating transportation for the elderly and people with disabilities. During <br /> the Hays Interagency workshop, attendees thanked staff for the years of support and transparency in the process. <br /> During the focus groups within departments, department heads stated they wished more funding was available. For the Capital <br /> Improvements department, the smaller funding budgets and several restrictions tied to CDBG compared to other funding sources <br /> Consolidated Plan SAN MARCOS 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.