My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 2003-156
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
2000 s
>
2003
>
Res 2003-156
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2007 10:43:34 AM
Creation date
2/20/2004 3:58:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Agreement
Number
2003-156
Date
9/8/2003
Volume Book
153
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />of Action. In addition, on April 10, 2001, the City of San Marcos Planning and Zoning <br />Commission approved the issuance of the specific use permit requested by Bonner Carrington on <br />behalf of Carson ("Specific Use Permit"). <br /> <br />4. On September 11,2001, the ZBOA held a second meeting regarding the <br />Applications, after which the ZBOA issued an Amended Record of Action. <br /> <br />5. As a result of differences of interpretation between Carson and the City <br />regarding the variances granted by the ZBOA and the specific use permit approved by the City <br />Planning and Zoning Commission, the Litigation ensued. <br /> <br />6. Whereas, in addition to a general denial, the Defendant raised certain legal <br />defenses to liability in the Litigation. <br /> <br />7. Whereas, Carson maintains that the City of San Marcos Zoning Ordinance <br />does not impose any building height restriction. <br /> <br />B. Whereas, the Defendant disputes liability in this lawsuit; however Plaintiff and <br />Defendant desire to resolve this dispute at the minimum of costs and disruption. In order to <br />minimize the further expense and uncertainty of further litigation with respect to same, Plaintiff <br />and Defendant have negotiated a resolution to the Litigation as more particularly set forth below. <br /> <br />e. Whereas, both the Plaintiff and Defendant desire to enter into this Agreement in full <br />settlement and discharge of all claims which have, or might be made, by reason of the legal and <br />factual issues described in Plaintiff s current pleadings, and the foregoing recitals. <br /> <br />D. Simultaneously with the execution of this Agreement, the parties will enter into a <br />final judgment as set forth below, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. <br /> <br />E. Accordingly, the parties, and each of them, have agreed, by and through their <br />respective authorized representatives that the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be <br />binding on the parties now and in the future. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, the Plaintiff and Defendant agree as follows: <br /> <br />II <br />DEFINITIONS <br /> <br />A. As used in this Agreement, "Release" means to fully, unconditionally, and <br />irrevocably release, acquit, and forever discharge the released parties and any related entities of the <br />released parties (individually, a "Released Party" and collectively, "Released Parties") of and from <br />any Claims (as defined below). <br /> <br />B. As used in this Agreement, "Claim(s)" shall mean any claim, debt, demand, action, <br />cause of action, suit, sum of money, contract, agreement, judgment, and liability whatsoever, both <br /> <br />- 2 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.