My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 2003-156
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
2000 s
>
2003
>
Res 2003-156
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2007 10:43:34 AM
Creation date
2/20/2004 3:58:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Agreement
Number
2003-156
Date
9/8/2003
Volume Book
153
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />counsel proposed by Carson. Such legal counsel, even though paid for by Carson, <br />shall be legal counsel for Client(s), shall be retained for the limited purpose of <br />defending Client(s) in such third party litigation and, to that extent, shall owe his <br />professional duty to each Client represented with respect to the subject matter of the <br />representation. Such mutually agreed to legal counsel retained to represent Clients <br />(as defined in this paragraph) shall not represent Carson in such third party <br />litigation. Both Carson and the City shall have the ability to provide input on the <br />defense, however, no input shall interfere with the mutually agreed to legal <br />counsel's professional obligations in representing the Client(s). <br /> <br />6 If any third party successfully challenges the validity of this Agreement or all or any <br />portion of the Final Judgment by obtaining a judgment from a court of competent <br />jurisdiction, Carson shall have the option of either appealing such judgment or <br />exercising his options under section III(D) of this Agreement once he has informed <br />the City, in writing, of his decision within a reasonable time. Should Carson chose <br />not to appeal such final judgment the City shall have the option of appealing the <br />judgment at its own expense and Carson will be free to exercise his rights under <br />Section HI(D) of this Agreement, irrespective of any pending appeal. Carson must <br />provide written notice to the City of his decision not to appeal such judgment, <br />should he chose to do so, in a timely mamler to allow the City enough time to <br />perfect an appeal. Notice shall be delivered to the City via hand delivery, facsimile <br />or certified mail as the following address or facsimile number: <br /> <br />City of San Marcos <br />Attn: City Attorney <br />630 East Hopkins <br />San Marcos, Texas 78666 <br />(512) 393-3983 facsimile <br /> <br />B. Defendant's Consideration and Agreement: As part of this Agreement, Defendant <br />agrees as follows: <br /> <br />1. The City agrees to approve the Modified Project as explicitly described below in <br />Section IV; <br /> <br />2. The City agrees to recognize the Variances described below as running with the <br />Property and applying to the Modified Project upon the condition that the Modified <br />Project is constructed on the Property; <br /> <br />3. The City agrees to recognize the Specific Use Permit granted by the City of San <br />Marcos Planning and Zoning Commission on April 10, 2001 as applying to the <br />Modified Project upon the condition that the Modified Project is constructed on the <br />Property; and <br /> <br />4. The City agrees to cooperate with Carson in the defense of any action that contests <br />the validity of the Final Judgment and/or this Agreement, including but not limited <br /> <br />- 5 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.