Laserfiche WebLink
DEMOLITION DELAY <br />FINDINGS <br />4 <br />1. The demolition delay ordinance does <br />not specifically address contributing <br />resources in National Register districts <br />that may not fall under any of the <br />other criteria for delay. <br />2. Avoiding the demolition of historic <br />resources whenever possible is a core <br />goal of preservation. The Secretary of <br />the Interior's Standards recommends <br />recordation as mitigation for the loss <br />of historic resources. However, in <br />practice, the demolition delays rarely <br />results in avoidance of demolition, <br />and alternatives are rarely identified. <br />3. There is no clear process and <br />assignment of responsibility for 1) <br />conducting additional research on <br />properties subjected to the demolition <br />delay and 2) developing demolition <br />alternatives. <br />4. There is no mechanism to stop <br />demolition after the delay period. <br />SOLUTIONS <br />1. Consider amending Section 2.7.4.1(B)(2) of <br />the SMDC to clarify that contributing resources <br />in National Register Historic Districts are also <br />subject to the delay period. <br />2. Provide property owners who submit a <br />demolition permit with a packet of resources, <br />including information on funding, grants, tax <br />credits, and the Secretary of the Interior's <br />Standards, as applicable. <br />3. Create an HPC committee to meet with property <br />owners after a demolition delay has been <br />issued to brainstorm alternatives to demolition, <br />and facilitate collaboration with preservation <br />stakeholders, such as local advocacy groups. <br />4. Consider updating the SMDC to require a <br />documentation package for all demolition <br />permits issued after a delay. This package <br />should align with the National Park Service's <br />Standards for Documentation and follow the <br />Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic <br />American Engineering Record/Historic American <br />Landscape Survey documentation guidelines. At <br />minimum, include photos and a brief property <br />history. In cases of financial hardship, explore City <br />subsidization or partnerships with Texas State <br />or other organizations like Preservation Texas <br />to assist with documentation. Where feasible, <br />salvage significant architectural elements for <br />reuse or archival preservation in accordance with <br />the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. <br />5. Establish a process and responsible parties for <br />research during the 90-day delay window to <br />determine if a property meets local landmark <br />designation criteria. <br />6. Consider updating the SMDC to allow denial of <br />the demolition for properties meeting landmark <br />criteria unless hardship is demonstrated. Assign <br />structural safety determinations to the Building <br />Official and historic or cultural value decisions to <br />the HPC. <br />124 SAN MARCOS HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN (2026) <br />