Laserfiche WebLink
137. <br />Regular Meeting January 12, 2004 Page 11 <br />Mayor Habingreither introduced for consideration removal from table and <br />adoption of a Resolution, the caption which was read as follows: <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS, <br />APPROVING THE APPOINTMENT OF OF THE LAW FIRM OF <br /> TO SERVE AS SPECIAL COUNSEL TO THE ETHICS REVIEW <br />COMMISSION; AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT <br />FOR THESE SERVICES AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE <br />AGREEMENT; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Mr. Mihalkanin moved to remove the Resolution from the table and Mr. <br />Montoya seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. Mayor Habingreither <br />stated he feels the Council does not need to hire a Special Counsel. He <br />also stated he feels this issue should be held in an expedient and cost <br />effective manner for the City. Mr. Taylor stated he will be represented <br />by Counsel, and he does not want the City to hire outside Counsel. Mr. <br />Mark Taylor stated if an outside Counsel is not hired, he will be legal <br />counsel for the Ethics Review Commission. Mr. Thomaides and Ms. Narvaiz <br />stated they understood if the Ethics complaint got this far, then outside <br />Counsel would be hired. Mr. Mihalkanin stated he remembered a discussion <br />regarding hiring outside Counsel in either October or November. He stated <br />he remembered the discussion was if the Ethics complaint got to this <br />point, then outside Counsel would be hired. He also stated he does not <br />feel outside Counsel should be hired, if Mayor Habingreither and Council <br />Member Taylor are comfortable with the City Attorney providing advice to <br />the Ethics Review Commission. Mr. Diaz stated he agrees with Mr. <br />Mihalkanin and feels this issue should be expedited. Ms. Narvaiz stated <br />she is concerned about putting the City Attorney in an awkward situation <br />and supports hiring outside Counsel because of that reason. Mr. Mark <br />Taylor stated he would not be able to provide enough time for this issue <br />and feels this will cause the complaint to draw out longer. Mr. Thomaides <br />stated he feels this will be an isolated issue and outside Counsel is <br />needed. Mr. Mark Taylor stated he would provide legal advice on issues <br />regarding the Southwest San Marcos Annexation. He also stated he would be <br />uncomfortable with giving advice knowing others may judge him on his <br />advice. He stated he would be more comfortable with outside Counsel who <br />has been involved in this type of issue. Ms. Narvaiz moved to approve the <br />Resolution and Mr. Mihalkanin seconded the motion. Mr. Thomaides moved to <br />amend the Resolution by hiring Monte Akers with the law firm of Bovey, <br />Akers & Bojorquez and Ms. Narvaiz seconded the motion. On roll call the <br />following vote was recorded: <br /> <br />AYE: <br /> <br />Narvaiz and Thomaides. <br /> <br />NAY: <br /> <br />Mihalkanin, Habingreither, Montoya, Taylor and Diaz. <br /> <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br /> <br />The motion failed. Mr. Thomaides moved to have Mark Taylor, City Attorney <br />to represent the Ethics Commission and Mr. Diaz seconded the motion. On <br />roll call the following vote was recorded: <br /> <br /> <br />